Framework and Outline Analysis of Moore's and Naddell's Research Proposals

Research Question Analysis
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Instructor’s Name
Date
Article One
Moore's proposal exhibits certain laudable qualities, such as articulating a lucid research question and furnishing a comprehensive background section (Moore, 2013; 1). However, some areas could benefit from further development. For instance, Moore needs to describe the methods employed to collect and analyze data comprehensively. This omission calls into question the feasibility of the proposed research and raises concerns about the generalizability of the findings. Furthermore, the proposal does not explain the rationale behind exploring the three alternatives, which may suggest to readers that the selection process was not sufficiently rigorous. Lastly, the proposal could be more explicit in delineating how the three factors of interest (USAF STEM strategic goals, cost-effectiveness, and the impact on retention) will be quantified and used to assess the alternatives (Moore, 2013; 4). In sum, while Moore's proposal is undoubtedly a strong foundation, addressing these limitations will further bolster the credibility and reliability of the research.[...