Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
3 pages/β‰ˆ825 words
Sources:
4 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Law
Type:
Coursework
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 17.5
Topic:

Legal Coursework Research: Litigation and Client Advise

Coursework Instructions:

Research Journal Assignment

(Module 13)

In this exercise, you will complete a short, informal, research journal. Why a journal? We are often interrupted or delayed in our research. Knowing where you are at in the research and why is important. You are also documenting research possibilities that you have eliminated in case you receive questions about those possibilities. A well-kept research journal makes writing a memorandum or brief easier. Finally, from an educational perceptive, a journal allows you to reflect on your research style to get the most out of the learning process. Remember to document your process, essentially “thinking out loud” as I cannot give credit by inferring what you did, only by what you document.

Coursework Sample Content Preview:

Litigation and Client Advise
Name
Institution of Affiliation
Date
Litigation and Client Advise
After the filing of the case at the state court in southern Carolina, the supervising attorney is aware that the court doesn't enforce forum selection of some clauses for cases outside the state. Then the PR officer moves the case to the federal court where he sues the company of breaching the contract. Therefore the case will take place at the federal courts. These are some of the prepositions and the advice to the client:
1 The allegation being relayed on the PR is that after the promotion for the company's product sales didn't rise of which that is not the duty of the PR officer. As from 42 U.S. Code § 7256- Contracts, leases, etc., with public agencies and private organizations and person's act, in the first place the PR officer has the right to get into a contract with the company as he is allowed by the law. He is a justified for that work. Therefore, the fraud allegations being accused on him are not true as he met all the demands as per the contract (U.S. Code: Title 41 - PUBLIC CONTRACTS). He has the authority to perform such contracts as it is provided by the law and thus he met the required standards. After he performs all the duty as per the contract, he is entitled to the payments for the contract. The claims are mere because after the PR performs his duty he cannot use falsehood to customers to purchase the products. Therefore, he has the right to terminate the contract after the agreed time has elapsed. The perception of strategizing it is where the company went wrong thus it is not able to reach as many customers as possible. As for the section 42 U.S. Code § 2210a - Conflicts of interest relating to contracts and other arrangements Act, the two parties are warring due to conflict of interest as one's objectives have not been attained yet the alleged individual has performed his duties effectively. The PR has performed his duties but due to the fact that the intended objectives of the organization in relation to the clients have not been met by the PR, the organization blames him for the failure. The law clearly states that there should not be an unfair competitive advantage, which in this case it can be facilitated by what the company wants. The PR officer met the agreed contract rights thus there is nothing else he can do and should not take blame (42...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Coursework Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!