Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
3 pages/β‰ˆ825 words
Sources:
6 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Coursework
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 15.55
Topic:

Christianity and Jainism Belief Systems

Coursework Instructions:

d Dying

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content

20.0 %Identification of Ethical Issues as They Relate to the Four Principles of Principlism
The ethical issues are incorrectly organized.
Ethical issues are adequately organized according to the four principles of principlism. Some of the categorization is suspect.
Ethical issues are organized according to the four principles of principlism.
Ethical issues are organized according to the four principles of principlism. A distinction between the four principles is clearly stated, but the reasoning of the categorization is merely adequate.
Ethical issues are organized according to the four principles of principlism. A distinction between the four principles and the reasoning of the categorization is clearly stated.
20.0 %Description of the Christian Worldview and the Other Worldview
The description of the Christian worldview and the selected worldview address little to none of the seven worldview questions and the description is mostly incorrect or irrelevant.
The description of the Christian worldview and the selected worldview address most of the seven worldview questions with little evidence of a surface-level understanding.
The description of the Christian worldview and the selected worldview adequately address all seven worldview questions, but the description has a surface-level understanding.
The description of the Christian worldview and the selected worldview address all seven worldview questions with evidence of basic understanding utilizing a detailed description.
The description of the Christian worldview and the selected worldview address all seven worldview questions with evidence of a deep understanding utilizing a detailed description.
20.0 %Analysis of Ethical Issues through Christian Worldview and the Other Worldview
The primary principles and values in the decision making process of each worldview have little to no relevance. Ethical reasoning seems to have no connection from the worldview considerations.
The primary principles and values are acknowledged in the decision making process of each worldview. Ethical reasoning is loosely based from the worldview considerations.
The primary principles and values surface in the decision making process of each worldview. Ethical reasoning is implied from the worldview considerations.
The primary principles and values are recognized in the decision making process of each worldview. Ethical reasoning is explained from the worldview considerations. Most implications of the principles and values are given consideration.
The primary principles and values are clearly distinguished in the decision making process of each worldview. Ethical reasoning is clearly delineated from the worldview considerations. The implications of the principles and values are given complete consideration.
10.0 %Personal Recommendation
The personal recommendation from the student's worldview is stated, but the justification has little to no relevance.
The personal recommendation from the student's worldview is stated with proper justification.
The personal recommendation from the student's worldview is stated with proper justification with some implications explained.
The personal recommendation from the student's worldview is stated with proper justification. The primary principles of the student's worldview are clearly described with most implications explained.
The personal recommendation from the student's worldview is stated with proper justification. The primary principles of the student's worldview are clearly described with all implications explained.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

Coursework Sample Content Preview:

Christianity and Jainism Belief Systems
Student Name:
Professor:
Course Title:
Date:
Christianity and Jainism Belief Systems
Different religions of the world hold diverse believe systems on a wide range of issues including end-of-life issues and patient suffering. This paper provides a comparative ethical analysis of the situation of George as well as decision from the viewpoints of two religions, namely Jainism and Christianity. The comparative ethical analysis describes how Jainism and Christianity would each interpret the nature of George’s illness and suffering. The sorts of considerations and values that Jainism and Christianity would focus on in thinking about whether or not he should choose euthanasia are also described.
Christianity Perspective
Christianity would interpret the nature of George’s illness and suffering by stating that illness and suffering are a reality of life in this world. Suffering is caused by the sinful nature of mankind. Even Christ Himself suffered torture, indignity, betrayal, as well as an awful death. Christians believe that suffering is not alleviated by Jesus’ teachings. Instead, it is Christ Himself who is able to ultimately relieve all suffering and pain in the life after death (Dutch, 2016). George and any other human being become ill because illness and death naturally come to every person since human beings are fallen people who live in a fallen world. People become sick and die since humans are imperfect beings who live in a world full of viruses and bacteria which attack their bodies (Judge, 2013).
In George’s analysis of his own life, the Christianity religion would think that George is still a valuable person and his life is still worthwhile as he was created in the image of God, in spite of suffering from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). In thinking about whether or not he should go for euthanasia, the sorts of considerations and values that Christianity would focus on include the following: every person is valuable since they are created in the image of God, the human life is a gift from God, all human lives are equally precious, and the dying process is spiritually significant hence must never be disrupted (The BBC, 2014).
Human lives possess an innate dignity and value since they were made by God for the distinct destiny of sharing in His own life. Proposing euthanasia means judging that the patient’s present life is really not valuable. This kind of judgment, according to the Christian faith, is contrary to recognizing the dignity, importance and value of that particular patient who is being euthanized. For this reason, arguments basing upon the quality of the person’s life are totally immaterial in Christianity (The BBC, 2014).
Therefore, the option that would be morally justified under the Christian faith is not to opt for euthanasia but instead allow the patient to die a natural death without physician assistance. Most churches hold the belief that the moment just prior to the occurrence of death is usually an intensely spiritual moment. They believe that interfering with the dying process is not the right thing to do given that this interference would disrupt the process of the soul of the dying patient movin...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Coursework Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now