Peer Reviews Regarding Gmail, PomoDoneApp, and TikTok

Outlines Peer Reviews
Author’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Code and Name
Professor’s Name
Date

Outlines Peer Reviews Outline Title: Gmail Outline (Simplify User Interface and Increase Account Security) Introduction/BackgroundWhat is the thesis statement of the outline? Thesis statement is not clear although it has something to do with increasing security and making the user interface simple.Was the system properly identified and introduced? If it was not clearly explained to the intended audience, state suggest improvements. Although system is well identified, the author should have indicated what Gmail support team is required to do to increase security. Is there a clear and logical argument made for the system being proposed? - Was the premise/change clearly explained? The argument is not logical and the suggested change is not explained correctly.Does the outline include 3 major premises to support the position? If so, discuss their appropriateness given the premise/change. If not, suggest/comment on possible additional premises to support the position. The outline shows two major arguments to support thesis statement. The author should include the third premise and support his/her position well using facts from scholarly sources. For example, the author should explain how the offline version of Gmail would increase account security.Logic Do the premises flow logically? - Identify any absences or gaps in the logic. The premises do not flow logically. No connection between the main argument and support points.Identify Logos presented in the outline. - What benefits are identified? Do they go beyond profit and revenue? The arguments given are not logical. The benefits would be accrued if Gmail improves its user interface and account security, which goes beyond revenues and profits. Identify Ethos presented in the outline. What expertise is shown? How is the research used to the authors advantage? Do you find the author creditable? No ethos presented. The author’s expertise is not shown and the person appears not credible. The research used to the author’s advantage is on the user interface improvement and account security.Identify any Pathos presented in the outline Is it appropriately used? Is it necessary and benefiting the outline? Nothing that the author says triggers the audience emotions. Pathos is not used appropriately. If it was used well, it would have been beneficial for the outline.SourcesEach point is supported by at least two academic/peer reviewed research? Proper citations (format: footnotes, sources: actual source, not search engine results). For each source, the sections paraphrased or quoted are highlighted in the pdf. Each point is not supported by at least two peer-reviewed articles. The sources used are not well-formatted and in-text citations are missing. There are no PDFs of the sources and sections paraphrased are not highlighted.ConclusionAre there several supporting points that lead to the author's conclusion? There are no supporting points that show the author’s conclusion.Overall Imp...