Evaluating Logical Arguments Discussion

Evaluating Logical Arguments Discussion
Author's Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Code and Name
Professor's Name
Date
Evaluating Logical Arguments Discussion
Proposal Title: Canvas ProposalCommentsFront Matter- Cover page appropriate (logo, author's name, proposal title)?The cover page is appropriate and has a logo, author's name, and proposal title.- Table of Contents included (Sections/Subsections & Page #s, Table of Figures)The table of content is included, and it has sections and subsections.- Abstract: Is the abstract ~150 words or less? As the reader, summarize the purpose of the document & the change that you obtained from the abstracts.The abstract has 84 words. The document's purpose and the change needed is for Canvas to implement the ability to view discussions as a continuous thread. Is the justification for the change appropriate? Specify your view on the change.The justification for the proposed change is appropriate. In my opinion, Canvas needs to change the way students see responses to a specific discussion.Introduction/Background- Is the system and the proposed changes clearly defined? Specify any improvements you would make.Yes. I like it the way it is.- Is the background focused on only giving the information necessary? Specify any additional aspects you think should be included or removed.The background is focused on giving the information necessary. Nothing should be included.Audience/ToneBased on your reading, what is the tone of the proposal? What changes do you recommend to ensure a professional tone written to the appropriate audience?The tone is formal and professional.Problem Statement and Proposed Changes- Is the problem with the current system clearly defined & justified? What improvements should be made?The problem is clearly defined, and I am convinced that Canvas needs to implement this change.- Are the proposed changes clearly defined and well-motivated by the problem statement? Specify improvements that can be made.The proposed change is defined clearly and well-motivated by the problem statement. However, the author should state how the change will increase users' productivity.- Do you believe it is plausible that the proposed changes could solve most, if not all, of the problem statement? i.e., was the problem statement concise and exact? Any suggestions?The problem statement is concise, and the proposed change addresses the issue entirely. - Is the market size for this system clearly outlined? Are statistics reported from credible market sources(Gartner, Forrester, IBIS World)?Market size is defined. Statistics given are credible, and they are from scholarly sources.- Images/Mock-Up of the proposed solution? Properly labeled & captioned?Figures and images used are labeled and captioned and contribute to the proposed solution.Benefits/Cost/Schedule/etc- Are the benefits both desirable and convincing to the audience of this proposal? For sure, the benefits of the proposed change are convincing and desirable.- Are the benefits of the proposed changes backed up by some amount of research, where necessary?The authors use appropriate studies to back up arguments.- Are the costs and schedule plau...