Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
3 pages/β‰ˆ825 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Life Sciences
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 11.88
Topic:

Case study analysis of Baby Theresa

Case Study Instructions:


************
ethical dilemma from baby Theresa perspective
Analyze the case from 3 perspectives, use 1 ethical principle for each perspective (you need to use 3 DIFFERENT ethical principles).
What are your recommendations?
i. Are your recommendations based upon your ethical analysis?
ii. Do your recommendations link to your ethical analysis?
iii. Rather than stating the obvious ( e. g. this problem could have been easily solved if … ) what do you recommend for similar cases in the future?)
Will your solution to the problem withstand criticism from the perspectives of both a variety of Ethical principles and Professionals in your field?
Conclusion Paragraph!!!!
Need to ALSO use the 2 references I supplied.... Bioethics & Rachels Chap 1
Seay, G., &; Nuccetelli, S. (2017). Engaging Bioethics: An introduction with case studies. New York, NY: Routledge.
Rachels, J. (2012). Chapter 1/ What is Morality. In The Elements of Moral Philosophy (8th ed., pp. 1-13). Burr Ridge, ILL: McGraw Hill Higher Education.
Please take a look at instructions below. Thank you
***********************
1st Case Study assignment
Steps in Ethical Case Analysis
1. Get the facts straight. Review the case. Briefly recap the details of the case at the beginning of your paper.
2. Identify the central stakeholders in the case. Identify 6.
3. Identify the technical/professional problem in the case.
4. Identify the Ethical problem or problems in the case.
5. Solve the technical and ethical problems using both technical and Ethical standards. Analyze the case from 3 perspectives, use 1 ethical principle for each perspective (you need to use 3 different principles).
6. Will your solution to the problem withstand criticism from the perspectives of both a variety of Ethical principles and Professionals in your field?
7. What recommendations can you make about the problems in the case based upon your ethical analysis?
When you construct your analysis be sure and remember that we are assigning a 3-page analysis. With this length limitation, it is important to realize that you will probably only be able to look at the problems in the case from three stakeholder perspectives. If you try to analyze every stakeholder perspective you will probably exceed the length limitation.
Grading and Evaluation of Individual Papers
1. What are the objectives of the papers?
A.
i. To become sensitized to the ethical issues in Engineering and Information Technology.
ii. Learn how to analyze a case.
iii. Learn how to identify the major stakeholders in a case.
iv. Learn how to identify the technical problems in a case.
v. Learn how to identify the ethical problems in a case.
vi. Learn how to apply ethical principles to a case.
vii. Learn how to make recommendations in a case based upon ethical analysis.

B.
a. Critical thinking
i. Did you identify and focus on the crucial material and facts in the case?
ii. Did you support claims you make about the case with facts?
iii. Did you think about the case from a variety of stakeholder perspectives?
b. Ethical analysis
i. Did you identify the central Ethical problem(s)
ii. Did you conduct a well thought out ethical analysis by applying 3 ethical principles?
iii. Did you justify ethical judgments with accurate facts and ethical principles?
iv. Did you think about the case from a variety of ethical perspectives?
v. Did you base your analysis upon ethical principles that cannot be easily criticized?

How will your papers be assessed?
Evaluations of Papers (Percentages)
A. The Case Recap (.10)
i. Do you highlight the key points in the case?
a. Are the facts in the case accurate?
b. Did you focus on the crucial aspects of the case?
c. Did you avoid including non-essential or superfluous information?
B. Stakeholders (.10)
i. Who are the primary and secondary stakeholders in the case?
ii. Did you clearly identify from which stakeholder perspective you are analyzing the material in the case?
iii. From whose perspective are you analyzing the case?

C. What is the central technical problem? (.15)
i. How is the central technical problem related to the ethical problems in the case?
D. What is/are the ethical problem/problems? (.15)
i. What ethical problems do you see in the case?
ii. What is the central ethical problem?
iii. Why is this the central ethical problem?
E. What ethical principles apply to the central ethical problem? (.30)
i. Do you correctly define the ethical principles you use?
ii. Have you correctly applied the ethical principles you use?
iii. Do the principles you use withstand obvious criticisms from other ethical perspectives?
F. What are your recommendations? (.20)
i. Are your recommendations based on your ethical analysis?
ii. Do your recommendations link to your ethical analysis?
iii. Rather than stating the obvious ( e. g. this problem could have been easily solved if … ) what do you recommend for similar cases in the future?
Rachel’s Chapter 1
Case 1: Baby Theresa P. 1
Stakeholders
Baby Theresa
[Other infants with Anencephaly]
Parents of Baby Theresa
Physicians of Baby Theresa
[Other infants who could benefit -potential organ recipients]
[Parents of Other infants who could benefit -potential organ recipients]
Florida Legal System
The Press [Media]
Technical Problem(s)/Issue(s)
Ethical Problem(s)/Issue(s)
2 Styles of analysis: Top-Down/Bottom-Up
Top-Down (general to specific)
Ethical Principles
Applied to details of the case
Bottom-Up (specific to general)
Ethical Principle
[2nd order principle]
Details of the case
Combined Diagram
Ethical Principle (1st Order Philosophical)
2nd order Ethical Principle
Details of the case
2nd Order Ethical Principles
The Benefits Argument p. 2
The Argument that we should not use people as Means p. 4
The Argument from the Wrongness of Killing p. 5
Case Study and everything needed is attached
In BIOETHICS pdf read pgs. 19-23, 25, 27, 29-34, 37, 40, 42

Case Study Sample Content Preview:
Ethical Case Study Analysis
Student’s Name:
Institutional Affiliation:
Course:
Instructor:
Date:
Ethical Case Study Analysis
The case is about Theresa Ann Campo Pearson, also known as baby Theresa, born with anencephaly in 1992 in Florida. This defect meant that the baby missed a large portion of the brain, skull, and scalp. Knowing that Theresa's case was fatal and that she was unlikely to survive, her parent Laura Campo consented to donate her organs before her actual death. During this time, Theresa breathed normally with ease, and according to Florida law, she was not legally dead. The rule was that Theresa would only donate her organs once biologically dead. And because she was still alive, any actions of retrieving her organs needed the court's approval.whereas the lower court could not approve it, the Supreme court ruled that Theresa's organs would not donate her organs when still alive. She, however, passed why physicians and her parents were making appeals for the same.
In this case, the stakeholders include Theresa Campo, her parents Laura Campo and Justin Pearson, the physician, the judicial system (The lower courts and the Supreme Court in Florida), and the infants who needed organ transplantation. From these actors, centrality was on Theresa, Laura, the physician, and the court.
In this case, the professional problem is anencephaly (brain dead), and the need to conduct an immediate organ transplant. Children born with this genetic disorder miss a large chunk of their skull and scalp. On the other hand, the breath normally and still experience a heartbeat. One would require a court order before donating their organs as they are not yet biologically dead. Though the physicians agreed with the idea of organ transplantation for the sake of the infants who needed it, the law of Florida prohibited it. The ethical problem arises when there are laws that prohibit taking away one's life. The judges would not rule in favor of Theresa's parents because that meant they were supporting an innocent child's killing.
In dealing with this problem, one could argue that if conducting an organ transplant would help children whose lives depended on it, it would not be wrong to give Theresa's parents the consent. Theresa's parents and physicians wanted to perform an organ transplant was because it was evident that Theresa would not last being in that condition. Rachels (2012) argues that it is not wrong to donate one's organs from the benefits argument since this would not harm them. From the utilitarian viewpoint, so long as one's death would grant others a chance for better health, there is no problem with organ transplantation on a dying patient (Rachels, 2012). If doing this would make others happy and save them from their misery, the judges should not have stopped Theresa's parents from going on with their wishes.
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Case Study Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now