Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
5 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Communications & Media
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 8.91
Topic:

Identifying Ethical Issue in James Comey’s Communication with Public About FBI

Case Study Instructions:

Review the political communication case study materials.
Create a post, give it the title of “Comey” or “Clinton” to reflect with whom you side, and answer the questions below. While writing your post, incorporate at least one principle from the National Communication’s code of conduct and any other relevant personal, organizational, or professional values. Also, include any facts, citing them.
What did Director Comey in the FBI need to decide?
What were the one or more moral problems?
How were different stakeholders affected? (Go beyond talking about the U.S. voters.) For each stakeholder, could this individual or group of people voluntarily choose whether to be affected?
For what reasons do you side with James Comey or Hillary Clinton?
Resources:
This reading presents a set of user-friendly questions that you as a communication professional can answer to determine how to solve a moral problem in the workplace. Review it to get an initial understanding of the big picture; as the semester progresses, you’ll answer the questions in a stepwise fashion. Note that this reading is intended for instructors like me; regardless, I think you’ll find the information helpful:
Jennings, B. (2003). Introduction: A strategy for discussing ethical issues in public health. In B. Jennings, J. Kahn, A. Mastroianni, & L. S. Parker (Eds.), Ethics and public health: Model curriculum. Retrieved from https://s3(dot)amazonaws(dot)com/aspph-wp-production/app/uploads/2014/02/EthicsCurriculum.pdf (focus on pp. 3-4)
This week, you’ll practice articulating what one or more moral problems are, and in the process, you’ll look at how different stakeholders might be affected by them. The following reading will help you think about the full range of stakeholders:
Thompson, R. (n.d.). Stakeholder analysis. Retrieved from https://www(dot)mindtools(dot)com/pages/article/newPPM_07.htm (read all 3 pages)
The following readings and videos present a case study in political communication about which you will debate, specifically James Comey’s communication with the public about the FBI’s investigation of Hillary Clinton’s alleged misuse of a private email server for work. Your discussion will draw from these materials, so I recommend that you review the discussion questions before going through the materials:
National Communication Association. (1999). NCA credo for ethical communication. Retrieved from https://www(dot)natcom(dot)org/sites/default/files/pages/1999_Public_Statements_NCA_Credo_for_Ethical_Communication_November.pdf (read the 1 page)
ABC News. (2018, April 18). James Comey interview part 2: The Hillary Clinton email investigation [Online video]. Retrieved from https://www(dot)youtube(dot)com/watch?v=NvS67LEId7Y (view all 9:26)
CNN. (2017, September 14). Hillary Clinton: Time to abolish the electoral college [Online video]. Retrieved from https://www(dot)youtube(dot)com/watch?v=0s8a-lxXu68 (ignore the title of this video, which is misleading; focus on 7:51-9:50, and 12:40-21:18)

Case Study Sample Content Preview:

James Comey
Author’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Code and Name
Professor’s Name
Date
James Comey
The director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), James Comey, knew from the start that reopening the case was going to be trouble. In reality, Comey said that his deputy director said, “You know you are totally screwed” (ABC News, 2018). The FBI director needed to decide whether to reopen the case involving Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified information on her private email server or not. He knew that the road he took was bumpy and that his decisions would significantly affect the outcomes of the United States of America’s (USA) 2016 presidential election. What is more, Comey needed to be neutral during the investigation so that it does not appear as if the FBI was leaning toward either the Republican or Democrat side. For sure, it was a challenging decision to make, and something needed to be done to clear the air.
The primary moral problem was determining who was telling the truth. Specifically, identifying the ethical issue was not difficult, but assessing the factual information available to make the right decision was the most challenging thing (Jennings, 2003). Amidst all the allegations that Donald Trump made against Hillary, Comey was destined to identify whether it was true or the stories were just propaganda meant to tarnish Hillary’s reputation. Another moral problem was to determine the values at stake. Comey had to ask himself, how will the investigation affect the election? For sure, the release of information about Hillary’s careless handling of sensitive and classified information was timely. It happened in the last few days before the election, meaning it was the final bullet for Hillary. For sure, reopening the investigation made Hillary look like the bad person, and it must have changed many of her voters’ decisions who instead voted for her opponent.
As a person becomes successful, one’s actions influence more people. These individuals are called stakeholders (Thompson, n.d.). In the scenario at hand, the primary stakeholders were voters, FBI, women, Democratic Party, and President Barrack Obama’s administration. One of the National Communication Association’s codes of conduct emphasizes accuracy, honesty, truthfulness, and communic...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Case Study Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now