Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
No Sources
Style:
Chicago
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Term Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 10.37
Topic:

The Treatise on Human Nature, St. Thomas Aquinas

Term Paper Instructions:

PLEASE READ THE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY
Write a paper in which you identify and explain one argument Aquinas makes in the The Treatise on Human Nature. Choose an argument from the Corpus of one article (The corpus is the section labeled "Reply"): Pick one article from the list below.
Pick one article from the following list:
Q. 75, a. 1
Q. 75, a. 2.
Q. 75 ,a. 6.
Q. 82, a. 1.
Requirements
Things you must do:
Begin by stating the passage in which the argument is found. State the Question and Article number
Identify the conclusion of the argument.
Identify the premises of the argument. Present them by identifying each premise (For example: "Premise one is that..."). Quote the line from which the premise is taken.
Explain what each premise means. If St. Thomas gives an example or explanation of a premise, be sure to mention this. Define any technical terms. Cite previous articles if any of the premises are taken from previous articles.
For example: "Aquinas's first premise is that "the subject of a power is that which is able to operate" (Q. 77, A. 5, co.). Aquinas explains that this is because "every accident denominates its proper subject." Powers, Aquinas argues in Q. 77, a. 1, co., are proper accidents which belong to a living thing. They flow from the soul but are not part of the soul. The subject of a power possesses the power. However, what possesses a power is the same thing that use a power: "The same is that which is able to operate, and that which does operate." (Q. 77, A. 5, co.) This is clear from an example. Whatever performs the operation of heating could only do so because it possesses the power of heating. Thus the subject of operation is the subject of the power."
Things not to do:
Merely summarize the argument or the passage without identifying the premises. (i.e. "Aquinas says that the soul is not a body because he doesn't think that a body can be alive and, like, it totally isn't.")
Don't cite the text.
Quote objections (e.g. Obj. 1) as if they are St. Thomas's own position.
Formatting:
All text should be Times New Roman, 12 point font, double space. one inch margins. Paper should be at least one page, no more than two pages.
For citations, please use Chicago Manuel of Style. See the Purdue OWL for how to cite. All citations of St. Thomas should use the following format: Summa Theologiae Ia, Q. #, A. #, Section of article. A guide to the parts of an article can be found at the beginning of Pasnau's introduction.
All submissions are to be done through blackboard using either a Microsoft Word document or a PDF. Do not merely write your submission in the text box. You can only submit the paper once, so be sure you have your FINAL draft ready when you submit.
By submitting this paper, you agree: (1) that you are submitting your paper to be used and stored as part of the SafeAssign™ services in accordance with the Blackboard Privacy Policy; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution's policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates.

Term Paper Sample Content Preview:
Your Name
Your Subject and Section
Your Professor’s name
St. Thomas Aquinas
In the first article of St. Thomas Aquinas, in his book Summa Theologica he asked in Q. 75, a.1 “Whether the soul is a body?”. In this article, St. Thomas Aquinas concluded that while the soul is not a body, it is an act of the body. In line with this, Aquinas first answered some of the objections against this idea. The first objection that he addressed says that the reason as to why the soul would seem like a body, is because since the soul is a mover moved, and every mover moved is a body, then the soul would seem like a body. Before answering the main question, it would be better to provide Aquinas’ conception of the mover and the moved. Specifically, Aquinas’ uses the idea of the “mover” as an external force is in line with Aristotle’s where it is that makes a ‘not moving body’ move. Thus, following from his ideas, a non-moving body should not move, unless a mover prompts it to do so. Going back to the argument posited above, Aquinas stated that movers transforms the potentiality of moving to ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These Chicago Term Paper Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!