Legal Considerations of Emergency Manager During Searches, Seizures, and Evacuation Operations

Searches, Seizures and Evacuation Operations
Student's Name
University Affiliation
Professor's Name
Course Title
Due Date
Searches, Seizures and Evacuation Operations
Contemporary times present a particularly challenging time where disasters are highly probable. The factors that make disasters imminent include natural disasters, the great advancement in technology, and other man-made disasters. The dynamics of responding to disasters are significantly different from dealing with normal circumstances. During emergencies, it becomes crucial to execute planned decisions and to adjust them usually within the spur of the moment (Huang et al., 2021). Emergency managers find themselves in an unusual position where they have to respond in the best possible way. To respond in the best possible way, the emergency manager must be aware of the legal implications involved in situations of emergency (Canton, 2019). This paper will focus on the legal considerations that emergency managers must consider when carrying out searches, seizures, and evacuation operations.
Legal Considerations When Conducting Searches
One of the basic tenets of the United States Constitution is to provide citizens with the right to liberty. The bill of rights protects citizens from any form of unwarranted search. The law provides that a search can only be carried out where a warrant has been granted (Kerr, 2018). Drawing from this law, one may understand the difficult circumstances that an emergency manager may have when they want to conduct a search. It goes without saying that they must consult the provisions of the constitution concerning the same. Searching a person’s property without a warrant may open leeway for a legal suit that may lead to unwanted repercussions. Despite these circumstances, there are some provisions that act in favor of emergency managers.
Following is one of the provisions that could make the options of an emergency manager better without raising any lawsuit possibilities. Realizing the problematic circumstances that an emergency presents, the supreme court of the United States has ruled that it is sometimes legal to conduct a search without a warrant. This precedence could be an excellent example of when ‘law is not law.’ Some of the situations where an unwarranted search is permissible is where emergency doctrine exception arises. Further, an unwarranted search is also permissible if the owner of the property being searched gives consent for the same to happen.
The supreme court makes things very clear to avoid ambiguity. It defines an emergency situation as one where a government or other official must act so as to save life or property. A good example would be a situation where a house is on fire. If the provisions of the fourth amendment were to be followed in the most strict sense, then the firefighters would have to seek a warrant to enter the burning building to extinguish the fire. However, in such a situation, the law would provide a self-defeating mechanism that makes things worse while putting life and property at risk. Consequently, in the case of a fire, it is permissible to enter and search a building with the aim of extinguishing the fire. In light of these observations, the emergen...