Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
14 pages/≈3850 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
Chicago
Subject:
Law
Type:
Research Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 81.65
Topic:

Analysis of the Right to Life in the context of Death Penalty Essay Sample

Research Paper Instructions:

Topic: The interpretation of an important article of a major treaty since its passage (by international, regional, and/or domestic courts) and how that interpretation has evolved, been inconsistent, or been contested.
Provide an analysis on the right to life in the context of death penalty and how it is been interpreted by different courts. Compare and contrast the interpretation by the ICCPR and the European convention on human rights, or by regional court to see how they managed to include the death penalty in the provision for the right to life.
Look at the ICCPR and the drafting history of it and identify why they left out the death penalty. Why the European Convention on Human rights has abolished the death penalty under all circumstances. Look at how the interpretation of right to life has changed since the drafting of the ICCPR in comparison with the european and global standards.
Argue that the ICCPR does not go far enough to protect the right to life of individual in the context of the death penalty and the lack of prohibition on death penalty is a problem.
Use a critical perspective. The paper has to be nuanced. Include a section with arguments against the thesis.
Use examples / you can include a case study (it might be helpful)
Reference the applicable laws, relevant treaty, and amendment procedures.

Research Paper Sample Content Preview:

Analysis of the Right to Life in the context of Death Penalty
Name
Tutor
Course
Date
Analysis of the Right to Life in the context of Death Penalty
The right to life of the person and its various applications in different contexts is presently one of the most debated subjects. The debate has been steered with notable changes in topics, including the widespread demand for abortion and the debates on the use of euthanasia. Still, capital punishment is viewed as the biggest impediment to the complete implementation of the right to life. Like the other elements of the debate, capital punishment opens its scope to influential aspects of the right to life in political, social, economic, legal, and ethical constructs. However, the circumstances under which capital punishment is executed, such as the sanctioning by various legal systems with limited considerations of the facts, have made it highly debatable. Questions are asked on whether capital punishment contravenes the tenets of the right to life even though other humane options could be employed. In this paper, the focus is anchored on the analysis of the right to life in the death penalty context. Overall, capital punishment should be eliminated bearing its ills and the inputs of various legal jurisprudences such as the European Convention and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), albeit mildly.
The Right to Life
The right to life is fundamental in various constitutions of the world. Countries have instilled the Human Rights Act in their laws to protect the right to life. In those legal jurisdictions where the right to life is upheld, every person is granted the right to life and the right not to be arbitrarily deprived of that life. In the context of international laws, the right to life constitutes the obligation of states to be the primary protectors of the right to life among their citizens. The right to life is also enshrined in the moral obligations of humanity. It is universal for people to protect the lives of each other as each life is deemed valuable.[Tran, Kien and Cong Giao Vu. "The Changing Nature of Death Penalty in Vietnam: A Historical and Legal Inquiry." Societies 9, no. 3 (09, 2019).]
The right to life is applied differently, albeit inalienability, in various situations. In some constitutions, the right to life accommodates prevention of the use of force by public authorities, the delivery of medical treatment, and the investigations of public entities' conduct, especially when individuals die in their care. In more controversial aspects, the right to life has extended to define aspects such as abortion and capital punishment. Governments must impose the right to life. To that effect, the negative duty implies that public entities need to refrain from taking the lives of individuals, while the positive duty implies the need by public entities to protect the lives of individuals especially in cases where people are faced with immediate risks. Amidst all the above declarations, the international law and various constitutions, including the US, have not explicitly abolished capital punishment. That begs the question of whether such laws are structured to violate the right to life.[Ayukawa, Jun. "Claims-Making ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to death penalty:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!