How the Object Identity Would Change When They are Exhibiting in Different Museums

Essay Skeleton Structure: How the Object Identity would change when they are Exhibiting in Different Museums
Author’s Name
The Institutional Affiliation
Course Number and Name
Instructor Name
Assignment Due Date
Essay Skeleton Structure: How the Object Identity would change when they are Exhibited in Different Museums
Introduction
* This paper discusses the significance of object identity at a museum.
* The research question is, “how object identity would change when they are exhibited in different museums?” The paper reveals that object identity can be influenced by the historical, social, and physical context.
* There is a need to ensure object identity at museums is a priority for various reasons, including the ability to identify an object’s historical, social, and physical context. Also, various museums assume varying object identities for similar objects, which would alter object identity.
Background/Literature Review
* According to Latour (2012), the traditional critical theory should be revised to include a new understanding of the relationship between facts and values, nature and society, and the role of science and technology in society. The author indicates the need to embrace the actor-network theory, which includes mapping the relationships between institutions, objects, and people. The article applies to this paper because it focuses on the interpretation of objects by various individuals and how the objects are designed and marketed to the audiences.
* Appadurai (1986) prioritizes sociology, cultural studies, and anthropology. It entails the disregard for traditional anthropological focus to include the anthropology of globalization, which includes comprehension of the cultural and economic processes that shape contemporary society. The article also includes features regarding object design and marketing.
* The third article in this literature review discusses material culture studies, which is the primary interest of the research question. In this case, Hoskins (2006) indicates that objects should not be considered passive entities, which can be tied to the primary focus of object identity.
* Kopytoff (1986) also challenges the traditional techniques of studying material culture, which treats them as static entities with fixed meanings. Since the topic revolves around object identity at a museum, there is a need to disregard treating objects as static entities with fixed meanings. Instead, object identity can change or be influenced by social and physical contexts, including history or social aspects in which the objects were constructed or maintained.
* Based on Price and Epp’s (2010) analysis, people create and share stories about objects on a global scale, which justifies the need to embrace object identity, including the material culture that emphasizes the importance of objects in shaping cultural practices and beliefs.
* The last article in the literature is Joy’s (2009), which discusses the importance of object biographies. This is arguably an instance of object identity, which includes sharing insights regarding social and cultural dynamics.
Methodology
* Since the primary focus is on exploring the significance ...