Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
6 pages/β‰ˆ1650 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Law
Type:
Research Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 34.99
Topic:

Adoption and Safe Families Act 1997

Research Paper Instructions:

This assignment builds on the previous components of this research project, where you identified a social problem and selected a federal policy that affects it. Please assign same writer who did order number 00108979 that was written about immigration reform.
Once social workers have located a policy that addresses a social problem, the next step is to analyze the policy's development and potential impacts. In other words, does the policy resolve or mitigate the issue? Looking at China’s one-child policy, you would want to know whether it is indeed reducing fertility rates. Next, you would want to know if the policy has any unintended consequences that need to also need to be addressed. For example, China’s one-child policy has led to significant labor shortages in the country.
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following EPAs and practice behaviors:
Competency 5: Engage in Policy Practice
Identify social policy at the local, state, and federal level that impacts well-being, service delivery, and access to social service.
Related Assignment Criterion:
1. Analyze the development of the chosen policy.
Competency 5: Engage in Policy Practice
Assess how social welfare and economic policies impact the delivery of and access to social services.
Related Assignment Criteria:
2. Evaluate the effectiveness of the policy with respect to the target population.
3. Evaluate the feasibility of the policy.
Competency 5: Engage in Policy Practice
Apply critical thinking to analyze, formulate, and advocate for policies that advance human rights and social, economic, and environmental justice.
Related Assignment Criterion:
4. Identify the policy constraints that inhibit the policy from fully addressing the problem for the chosen population.
Assignment Description
In this assignment, you will analyze the federal policy you chose to address your social justice issue, including providing background of the development of the policy and evaluating its effectiveness and feasibility. Remember that the feasibility of a policy relates not only to its economic feasibility, but also to its political and social impact. You will also identify the policy constraints that inhibit the policy from most effectively reaching your targeted population.
Continue to consult Congress.gov, the Government Accountability Office, public policy analysis research and reports, and other peer-reviewed research to support your analysis. Also, use your Social Work Speaks Policy textbook and the "NASW Code of Ethics" website to guide your analysis. They are listed below.
(1) Stern, M. J., and Axinn, J. (2018). Social welfare: A history of the American response to need. (9th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
(2) Wehrmann, K. and McClain, A. (2018). Social work speaks: National Association of Social Workers policy statements. Washington, D. C., DC: NASW Press.
Assignment Instructions
For this assignment:
Analyze the development of your chosen federal policy.
Analyze the historical background that led to the development of the policy.
Define the goals of the policy and how these goals are intended to be met, including services and programs intended to achieve the goals.
Evaluate the effectiveness of the policy with respect to the target population.
Consider how well the policy has met the needs of your target population and to what extent it improves the social justice problem you initially researched. Does the policy seem to ignore, impede, or strengthen the social functioning of the target population?
To what extent does the policy meet or improve the social values of the target population?
To what extent does the policy adhere to best practice ethics and best practice standards?
If the outcome of your analysis is that best practice ethics and standards are not being adhered to, include that information in your analysis as well.
Evaluate the feasibility of the policy.
Is the policy politically, economically, and administratively feasible? Provide details and rationale.
Identify the policy constraints that inhibit the policy from fully addressing the problem for the chosen population. Have other constraints arisen since the passage of the policy that have made conditions worse or better for the chosen population?
Guidelines
Support your claims and recommendation with clear rationale and support from scholarly, peer-reviewed literature.
Additional Requirements
The assignment you submit is expected to meet the following requirements:
Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting standards.
Cited resources: Minimum of eight scholarly sources. All literature cited should be current, with publication dates within the past five years.
Length of paper: Six double-spaced, typed pages.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Due date: August 23, 2020
Attached is a example copy of how the research paper should be formatted and a copy of Policy Analysis Scoring Guide. The Title page and Reference page are free. Please submit the link as a document so that if any corrections are to be made.
Thanks for all of your help!
Tayna L. Franklin
228.355.0122

Research Paper Sample Content Preview:

Adoption and Safe Families Act 1997
Tayna Franklin
Capella University
Social Welfare History, Policy and Practice
August 21, 2020
Introduction
The Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 is certainly the essential piece of federal child welfare legislation in America for the last twenty-plus years. The act focus to create safer, secure, and stable settings for abused children by quickly moving them through the foster care system as well as incentivizing adoptions when reunification with their family members is considered unacceptable (Edwards & Few-Demo, 2014) (Phagan-Hansel, 2018,). ASFA, by all accounts, was envisioned to combat overcrowded and overburdened child welfare system, particularly the foster care system by terminating parental rights and allowing for permanent adoptions (Curtis & Denby, 2004).
On the flip side, the prevailing faith of stability in this act is misplaced and have been challenged by many researchers – not because maltreated children do not benefit from a safe, secure and stable environment, but because the reformers and policymakers’ idea are often mistaken that permanence resolves concerns of child welfare malpractices. Therefore, this study will explore Adoption and Safe Families act development, goals, effectiveness, practicability, implications and constraints and possible solutions for improvements.
Development of Adoption and Safe Families Act
Over the years, the United States federal government has been known to be a strong advocate of family institutions and the privileges of family members, including parents and children. In this respect, the federal government has developed laws such as the Adoption and Safe Families act to protect and enhance the welfare of family members (Stern, 2018). The Adoption and Safe Families Act was formed and signed into law by President Clinton in 1997 to reduce the rising number of children who stayed in the foster care for long or suffered from multiple placements – and were unsafe to be returned into their biological environments (Phagan-Hansel, 2018).
During the course of the 1990s, the number of children in foster care rose to unprecedented levels – reaching the highest number of 567,000 children in 1998 (Phagan-Hansel, 2018). The rise was significantly impacted by the increased crack of drugs, including cocaine epidemic, HIV/ AIDS, and parental incarnation amidst the ill-equipped welfare systems that did not support families remain together (Swann & Sylvester, 2006). Similarly, thousands of children remained in the foster care system for years without going home (Phagan-Hansel, 2018). In reality, these children languished in the foster care system and often bounced through multiple families without having one they would call their own. For example, in 1997, over 30% of all children in foster care had been in these systems for at least three years (Phagan-Hansel, 2018). It is in this respect that the state was desperate to find an alternative home for such children thus the formation of Adoption and Safe Families act.
This landmark legislation stresses that timely permanency planning and safety and security for mistreated children is paramount for their well-being. As such, the act clarifies the mean...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Research Paper Samples: