Peer Review on the Memo about Excessive Pollution in Lake Ontario

Peer Review Process – Some Guiding Prompts and Questions Feedback and suggestions (enter your responses here, bullet points are fine) First impressions:• Appearance?• Does the proposal address the three main Tasks for the proposal assignment? Is it clearly marked
• The memo is well written and sticks to the appropriate format.• Yes, it provides an analysis on the issue at hand, reason for urgency and background.Survey and scan:• Is it easy to see important information?• Does the language look straightforward?• Is it concise? • Yes, the important information is well laid out in respective paragraphs. • The language used is fluent English and It provides straightforward layout of the proposal.
Read the draft: • Is the information relevant and to the point?• What kind of tone is used? Is it appropriate?• Does the draft speak to the audience? If not, what can you suggest? • Are sentences clear and reasonably free of serious grammar errors?
• The information is relevant in showing the extent of excessive pollution in Lake Ontario.• Yes, it is appropriate. The tone in used in the memo is serious which amplifies the intensity in which the author seeks for the situation to be addressed.  • Yes, the draft speaks to the audience. It aims is to remind everyone of the pollution of Lake Ontario that is happening at an alarming rate.• The memo is articulate mostly because of the grammatical error free nature of the draft.
Assessing Research: • Apply the CRAAP evaluation criteria to the listed sources. Do the sources pass the test? • Review the assignment: do the sources meet the stated requirements of the assignment?• Is the information complete? • Is the rationale for the chosen research sources credible? • Are there potential gaps in the research provided? • Does your partner need more research or more appropriate research? 
• Yes, the sources pass the CRAAP evaluation criteria. On Currency, the references provide information that is current to the topic. The references are dated 2019 and 2020 with the current dated 2021. They are all relevant to the topic consequently ensuring the relevance is achieved. The authority, accuracy and purpose of the sources all combine to ensure the CRAAP is passed.• Yes, the sources meet the criteria since they are recent and peer reviewed.• No, the memo only provides a summary and paraphrased content regarding the pollution of Lake Ontario.• Yes, the reason and logic behind the research makes sense. The memo analyzes how the Lake Ontario is in the same danger it was 50 years ago.• Yes, the research does not explore all possibilities to differentiate the situation of Lake Ontario in 1...