Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Questions:
3 questions
Sources:
1 Source
Style:
APA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Multiple Choice Questions
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 12.96
Topic:

Human Embryos and Jeff McMahan's Argument for Assisted Conception

Multiple Choice Questions Instructions:

Required Lecture: https://www(dot)youtube(dot)com/watch?v=ESuCmRN-P0E
The answers to the following questions are in this lecture. The only source needed is this video.
QUESTION 1: Adam has a genetic disease, which gives him frequent and severe migraines, and will likely shorten his life substantially. Nonetheless, Adam still considers his existence worthwhile. Unfortunately, Adam’s disease is 100% inheritable and any child he has will inherit his condition, Adam knows this.
Explain in reasonable detail what Derek Parfit would say about the claim that Adam should not have any children because in doing so he would be harming them
(hint: think about the Non-Identity Problem).
QUESTION 2: State and explain in reasonable detail Jeff McMahan’s argument from assisted conception.
QUESTION 3: Explain in reasonable detail why Jeff McMahan thinks that “We were never six-day-old embryos”.
NOTE: THE ANSWER TO EACH QUESTION CAN ONLY BE 1 OR 2 SCENTENCES

Multiple Choice Questions Sample Content Preview:

Human Embryos and Possible Persons
Name
Institution
Course
Date
Human Embryos and Possible Persons
Question 1
The current scenario involves Adam, who has a genetic disease that his child can also inherit. From the case, Derek Parfit would use the non-identity problem to explain the best option. Morally, suppose the individual is at risk of inheriting a genetic disease. In that case, the best option is to avoid having children or choose to get a different child who takes the place of the first child that Adam wanted to have (Ozturk, 2022). The different person is nonidentical but has a higher chance of surviving for longer.
According to the non-identity problem, the best option for Adam is one that will benefit everyone. The action can only be wrong if it leads to unwanted effects or harms some future or existing person. In other words, if existence is the best option and nobody's interests are at stake, then choosing to have a child is not a morally wrong decision. Parfit believes that it is best to make a decision advantageous to future generations rather than harming them. Moreover, we cannot state that delaying having a child so that they do not suffer the genetic disease is improving the person's life. The child Adam gets soon and the child he would get several years later is not the same (Ozturk, 2022). It will involve a different sperm and a different egg which creates the two offspring. By choosing to wait to have a child, Adam causes the children not to exist. The non-identity problem also posits that when making decisions that are advantageous to future generations, Adam is causing those he plans to benefit not to exist and thereby harming them instead of helping them. He has already harmed them by choosing not to have a child.
Question 2
Jeff McMahan's argument for assisted conception is that it is better to be frozen than death. Assisted conception is part of human embryonic stem cell research, which involves extracting embryos that are then killed. The argument for assisted conception is that if human embryonic stem cell research is wrong because it leads to the death of embryos, then assisted conception is also wrong since it also leads to the death of embryos (Ozturk, 2022). Embryos consist of the initial stages in the existence of...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to physician assisted suicide:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!