Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
5 pages/≈1375 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Level:
APA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Movie Review
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 18
Topic:

Tedtalk review Literature & Language Movie Review (Movie Review Sample)

Instructions:

EASIA 202R- Chinese Culture and Society (Sec 001) 1 TED Talks Review TED is a non-profit organization whose mission is to share “Ideas Worth Spreading” as a global community in the form of talks. In this course, you are required to create reviews/critiques on two TED Talks that you choose from the twenty talks listed below. You may watch the Ted Talks on its website or its downloaded APP “TED” on your smart phone. TED Talk Options: 1) Kevin Rudd: Are China and the US doomed to conflict? 2) Dambisa Moyo: Is China the new idol for emerging economies? 3) Eric X. Li: A tale of two political systems 4) Leslie T. Chang: The voices of China's workers 5) Michael Anti: Behind the Great Firewall of China 6) Yang Lan: The generation that’s remaking China 7) Martin Jacques: Understanding the rise of China 8) Joseph Nye: Global power shifts 9) Yasheng Huang: Does democracy stifle economic growth? 10) Liu Bolin: The invisible man 11) Abigail Washburn: Building US-China relations by banjo 12) Jennifer 8. Lee: The Hunt for General Tso 13) ShaoLan: The Chinese zodiac, explained 14) Hans Rosling: Asia’s rise---How and When 15) Angela Wang: How China is changing the future of shopping 16) Gary Liu: The rapid growth of the Chinese internet---and where it’s headed 17) Matilda Ho: The future of good food in China 18) Graham Allison: Is war between China and the US inevitable? EASIA 202R- Chinese Culture and Society (Sec 001) 2 19) Angel Hsu: How China is (and isn’t) fighting pollution and climate change? 20) Nanfu Wang: What it was like to grow up under China’s one-child policy? After watching the TED Talks, you are to create reviews/critiques on the two talks (each review with 600-800 words). The review will contain four sections. The requirements for each section are listed below. Please note that questions serve as guidelines to generate your review but you do not need to answer all of them. Your review should be a well-organized essay, not bulletined points or answers to provided questions. 1) Background: A short biographical section on the speaker. *Where is the speaker from? *What kind of research does the speaker do? *What are some of the speaker’s major accomplishments? *What are some of the speaker’s goals? 2) Summary: Summarize the main points of the lecture. *What is the “Idea Worth Spreading” presented by the speaker? *Does the speaker offer any solutions to a problem if there is one? *What are the solutions? *Include quotations/lines that you think are very important to the issue. 3) Connections: Demonstrate your understanding of this lecture by exhibiting connections between ideas in the TED Talk and what you have learned from the class or what you know about China. *What ideas in the lecture made you stop and think? *What ideas are contrary/familiar to what you know about China? *How do some ideas relate to your own experience? 4) Critique: Critique the lecture with your own responses and reactions. *Describe the methods that the speaker has used to support his/her ideas? Statistics? Research? Logic? Experience? Story? Visual aids? Are these methods effective to support this issue? *Do you agree/disagree with the speaker? Why? *After watching this lecture, will you look for more lectures by the same speaker or about the same topic? Due date for the TED Talk Reviews: Feb 3, 2020 (Monday). EASIA 202R- Chinese Culture and Society (Sec 001) 3 “TED Talk Reviews” Rubric (10 points, 5 points for each) CATEGORY Excellent 10 Proficient 8 Adequate 6 Unsatisfactory 4 Score Background (2 points) A concise biographical section on the speaker. Reveals key information about the subject in a well-organized manner. A concise biographical section on the speaker. Reveals key information about the speaker in an organized manner. Biographical information about the speaker is revealed but may lack organization or extraneous information is given. Key biographical information is missing or inaccurate. Information is not structured or organized. Summary (2 points) A concise summary of issues, ideas, and innovations. It combines ideas from the lecture into new sentences using your own words. A relatively brief summary issues, ideas, and innovations. It combines ideas from the lecture into new sentences using your own words. Issues, ideas, and innovations mentioned but may miss major points. It repeats ideas from the lecture often using language similar to that of the speaker. Summary is mostly an outline of the speech, but does not summarize clearly the major issues, ideas, and innovations. There may be one direct quote “thrown in” for effect. Connections (3 points) Provides detailed, insightful discussion of your reactions to the speaker, what you have learned, and how it can be applied to your own experience. Provides discussion of your reactions to the speaker, what you have learned, and how it can be applied to yourself. Provides limited discussion of what you’ve learned, but your reactions or the application to yourself is missing or lacking details. The discussion of reactions to the speaker, what has been learned, and how it can be applied to yourself is vague or missing. Critique (3 points) Identifies speech methods employed by the speaker and critiques effectiveness of each method. Includes critique of the relevance of the subject to society, with specific recommendations from the reviewer for further research. Identifies speech methods employed by the speaker and critiques effectiveness of some of the methods. Includes critique of the relevance of the subject to society, along with recommendations and thoughts for future research. Identifies speech methods employed by the speaker but analysis of effectiveness is not strong. Limited discussion of the relevance of the subject in society. Reviewer recommends watching the video but doesn’t give thought toward future research. Critique consists of basic opinions, such as “I liked it.” or “I hated it.” It is not considered a critique because it does not identify methods or analyze effectiveness. Reviewer gives no recommendations.

source..
Content:


Ted Talk Review
Name
Institution
Due Date
Ted Talk Review
The Voices of China’s Workers – Leslie T. Chang
Leslie T. Chang is a Chinese-American journalist. She had been a China correspondent for the Wall Street Journal and her work has often attracted or received positive reviews. Chang’s perception of society is quite unique and this is what sets her apart. Her views on society are well-researched and not products of what has already been done by others before. She is widely known for two books that helped change the perception of the world particularly her readers. The books include Factory Girls: From Village to City in a Changing China and Factory Girls: Voices from the Heart of Modern China. In these books, she tells the stories of women who aspire for better lives and appear unafraid to take risks as they transition from the village to the large cities of China. Chang gifts the world books that showcases the lives of individuals behind the economic upsurge of China. They are indeed masterpieces and ardent readers ought to spare some time for these two books.

...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to language essays:

  • Life According to TV Literature & Language Essay
    Description: Concepts and perceptions of life have been explored in several ways in the “Game of Thrones” through the use of narrative plot and exploitative thematic concerns. The use of individual characters has been based on the aspect of creating real-life perceptions and using the concepts to drive thematic...
    3 pages/≈825 words | MLA | Literature & Language | Essay |
  • Is Google Making Us Stupid? Nicholas Carr Literature & Language Essay
    Description: Nicholas Carr observes that the internet and Google have transformed how people reason. Today, people lack the creativity to think independently and find practical solutions to their problems. Instead, they rush to Google for almost everything, which impedes their ability to be rational thinkers (Carr 89)....
    1 page/≈275 words | MLA | Literature & Language | Essay |
  • Response Essay Literature & Language Essay Research
    Description: Debates on the relationship between Native American mascots and Native people have arisen over the years. Many people believe and say that sports teams with Native American mascots preserve various stereotypes against Native people. The protesters think that mascots are a threat...
    4 pages/≈1100 words | MLA | Literature & Language | Essay |
Need a Plagiarism Free Essay?
Submit your instructions!