Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Movie Review
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 10.8
Topic:

The eyes of empire. Literature & Language Movie Review

Movie Review Instructions:

Before looking at what some games can tell us about migration, it seems useful to look at what most games tend to tell us about the world. This week's readings provide a critical examination of two games, Full Spectrum Warrior and Civilization III, solid examples of the first-person shooter and the strategy genres. It may be useful to choose a text based on what one is most familiar with, but not necessarily. Of the two, Wark is the more densely theoretical. When citing her, please use paragraph number, as in neither the attached pre-print (2006) nor my printed version (2007) does she provide page numbers. E.g. "The novel is a line of a certain type, which opens towards certain possibilities, a storyline" (Wark 2007: 60).
When considering these games, I challenge you to ask where the migrants are in these games. Are they called migrants, or something else? Are there good migrants or bad migrants, or both? Take seriously the claims of these games to portray a realistic - if not real - world. Even if no one called a migrant is presented in gameplay, we can extrapolate. First-person shooters set in "bad countries" frequently depict civilians, but as a rule do not simulate the things those civilians will do to survive. Why this silence?

Movie Review Sample Content Preview:

Title
Your name
Subject and Section
Professor’s Name
Date
Week 11
For centuries, wars have caused destruction all over the world. These destroy the lives of any parties involved. Everything is tragic, no matter what side you took. This paper reflects on the negative impact of wars and how are wars reflected on strategic games.
Dyer-Witherford & de Peuter (2009) discussed the damages incurred by those who were personally involved in the war. Most people only sympathize with the country that suffered the most damages. However, people often do not consider those wounded soldiers whose only wish is to fulfill their duties. All of us understand that whatever principles they have, their allegiance is with their sworn country and deviating from their duty is a taboo. However, despite possibly having the upper-hand, deep within their souls, the soldiers are damaged too. Physical damage is controllable, but the emotional and mental repercussions of the experience may have a long-term or even permanent effect. After their battle in Iraq, the soldiers went back to the United States. Many of them were wounded and suffered from mental health illnesses secondary to physical trauma and emotional shock. This led to the proposition of the use of virtual therapies where the soldiers are subjected to a simulated experience to bring out their repressed emotions and memories about the war (Dyer-Witherford & de Peuter, 2009, p. 97).
On my account, this is the American government’s way to push the wounded hearts back to a battle they never want to participate in again. What is worse is that the American government will do everything to mask its evil actions against those who are ostracized and to those who banished their land to seek for asylum to other more peaceful countries. In the YouTube Video published by Al Jazeera English (2012), the US military collaborated with Hollywood to create the film, “Act of Valor,” and employed the real soldiers to become actors. The objective of the military is to show the public the struggles of solely the soldiers. While it may seem tantalizing to the viewers’ eyes, it omits the fact that many innocent people became migrants because of the conflict started by the highly militarized or powerful countries.
The same situation is portrayed in the game, “Oligarchy.” Here, the setting is after World War II, where the petroleum companies began to extract oil in poorer countries such as Nigeria and Venezuela. The oil company displaces the indigenous peoples and the natives of the lands to extract oil. If the natives voice out of their concerns through rallies, the company may opt to bribe some parts of their government and to hire a team to kill the demonstrators (MolleIndustria, n.d.). This situation is very much the same as the one previously explained. Although throughout the game, the government made actions to prevent further destruction of lands, the oil companies prevailed and silenced all the others employing killing and neglect. The oil company serve as the oppressor, and it displaces those who live peacefully. Despite that, the oil company gets all that it needs, from recognition down to revenues while the natives become the losers purely. The ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to world war 1:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!