Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
6 pages/β‰ˆ1650 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
Other
Subject:
Law
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 25.92
Topic:

Development of the EU Supremacy. Law Assignment.

Essay Instructions:

you do not need to provide footnotes but please just indicate where the information is taken from. You do not need to follow the OSCOLA strictly, just provide the author's name and some indication of the title in your footnotes, for example (Barnard, European Union Law). For cases, the name of the case and the year in brackets is sufficient. Please note that plagiarism rules still apply so make sure you do not “copy and paste” any part of your essays.
You need to make sure that you acknowledge when you have taken material from another source (e.g. journal article, textbook) but you are not expected to provide full OSCOLA/Harvard references or a bibliography.
• If you are quoting from a source, make sure that you identify the author and the date/page but you will not be expected to have detailed footnoted references.
You can check the similarity rate by using the same portal where you submit your CW (there is no separate portal for Turnitin).
Presentation: typed assignments should follow the standard guidance and be submitted as a Word document where possible . It should be in Arial font size 11 and double line spacing.
'[T]he Treaties do not expressly provide for the supremacy of Union Law, nor do they, therefore, specify how that supremacy should be applied in the Member States.'  Horspool M et al, European Union Law, 10th ed (Oxford 2018) 195.  With reference to case law, examine and evaluate the development of the principle of supremacy of the European Union law by the Court of Justice.   

Essay Sample Content Preview:
Development of the EU Supremacy
Name
Institution
Development of the EU Supremacy
Introduction
Community legislation is supreme over national laws of member states. The EU laws are enforced to the member states through procedures that portray their effectiveness over the national laws. Three international agreements established these community laws (Graziatti, 2018). The treaties created a mutual obligation between the parties involved in the contract. Over time, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) drew different conclusions about the treaties. This distinguished the agreement from other international contracts. The treaties created independent governmental bodies and endowed them with judicial, legislative, and sovereign rights transferred to them by the European Community members.[Graziatti, The Treaty of Rome, EEC and EURATOM, 1957: ABC Research Alert 5(3), 2018.]
The community legislation principle of supremacy is not revered under the treaties. None of them set rules that the law should have precedence over the national principles. The principles were not endorsed by the revisions of the treaties as well. They have silenced the affairs surrounding the accord of disputing community legislation and the national rules. However, it acts as an important chunk of the legitimated plan. The precept of preeminence is an unrecorded precedent of the European body not applied in the pedestals of the Union ( Pavone and Tommaso, 2019). The creed has advanced via the edict of the court of justice. Additionally, this has been a metamorphic and not subversive course.[Pavone and Tommaso, The Evolving Judicial Politics of European Integration: The European Court of Justice and National Courts Revisited: European Law Journal 25(4), 2019.]
The Community Court established orderliness that makes community principles exercise seniority over disputing national rules. The territorial courts have an obligation of ensuring the constructive efficacy of ascendancy through vindicating of the Communal legislation. Nevertheless, how the people received the doctrine of supremacy in the member states is varied. Naturally, the EU is grounded on the competences attributed by the nations via the Treaties. In a field where there is a lack of competence, national laws take over precedence instead of Community principles. The jurisprudence of the court in some cases has been essential in the evolution of the doctrine of supremacy. This paper will examine and evaluate the development of the principle of supremacy by scrutinizing the major causes that contributed to its growth.
The Creed of Direct Effect
Growth of primacy began in 1963 involving Van Gend en Loos a Dutch organization that purchased synthetic goods in Germany (Van Gend en Loos, 1963 ). The corporate complained about the duties imposed by the Dutch Customs and Excise on their goods was very high. They claimed because the 25th Article of the European Community warns against imposing other duties, this act was discordant with the EC. Therefore, the company filed a case to counter the Dutch imposts in Tarief commissie in Amsterdam. As a result, the Dutch Court referred the action to the ECJ for a ruling. At the same time, it was not certain that the Article was applicable when the case inv...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These Other Essay Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!