Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
5 pages/≈1375 words
Sources:
4 Sources
Style:
MLA
Subject:
Mathematics & Economics
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 21.6
Topic:

Theories of Economic Cycles

Essay Instructions:

In this class, we covered different theories of economic cycles (booms and busts) and/or economic crises developed by a diverse range of thinkers. Pick at least two distinct theories of economic cycles associated with at least two of the economists we discussed. Carefully summarize each explanation of economic cycles and compare the explanations to each other. Describe any implications for economic policy from your consideration of these theories. Examples of economists you may want to consider: Keynes, Hayek, Minsky, Friedman, and Schumpeter.
Your paper should:
-Refer to readings from the Little History of Economics (a minimum of 2 different chapters) or one of the other assigned readings.
-Incorporate a minimum of 2 additional references, beyond the class materials and readings.
You must cite the sources when you take material from another source. If you quote directly from another source, use quotation marks in addition to citing the source. Failure to cite sources could be a violation of the academic honesty policy.
Due date 5/19/2023

Essay Sample Content Preview:
Student's Name
Instructor's Name
Course Name
DATE \@ "d MMMM yyyy" 13 May 2023
Theories of Economic Cycles
INTRODUCTION
British economist John Keynes created The Keynesian economic theory, describing his economics approach. The theory suggested that the government should boost its spending to boost economic growth. Increased government spending results in a rise in overall commodity demand. The economist held that a nation's economy is primarily driven by consumer spending. As a result, the Keynesian theory promotes a fiscal expansionary approach, with government spending on infrastructure, unemployment aid, and education as its key pillars. In contrast, Friedrich A. Hayek created an economic theory of money and economic fluctuations. In contrast to government spending, the concept claimed that private investments would foster stable economic development. Friedrich is therefore thought to favor a system of free markets that excludes government interference. The study discusses and compares theories of economic cycles by Keynes and Hayek while highlighting their implications for monetary policy.
Hayek's formation of a business cycle theory was his first major contribution to economics. According to Hayek's approach, the natural interest rate functions as an intertemporal cost, coordinating the choices of saving and investors within a period. The cycle starts when this natural rate of interest and the market rate of interest, which is the rate that currently rules the economy, change. As a result, the invested stock's structure is warped and no longer accurately conveys the goals of investors and savers, as demonstrated by the financial markets (Gintis 112). His argument had the regrettable policy implication that efforts to combat an economic downturn or a time of high unemployment with a rise in the money supply would worsen the distortion of the capital stock's composition. His solution was to watch for the financial crisis to end so the market rate might revert to its natural level. Although Hayek's trade cycle theory, which was developed during the Great Depression, has few adherents presently, some parts of it are still useful. These involve Hayek's view that the interest rate is an intertemporal pricing and that variations in the availability of cash may play a significant role in discoordination, especially when those variations impact prices' ability to reflect comparative scarcities fairly.
Hayek's economic theory was based on the capital, monetary, and Austrian theories of business cycles. How human behavior can be controlled is an essential issue for a financial system, according to Hayek. Markets, according to him, are impulsive and unpredictable. The behaviors and reactions of people heavily influence the economy. He thought about the explanations as to why markets occasionally did not align with people's goals and actions, which hurt economic progress and led to high unemployment rates (Bruce 89). He believed that the availability of money played a role in this situation. Low-interest rates resulted from increased pricing and production levels as central banks raised the money supply. He contends that high investment rates could result from low-interest rates. He promoted long-term financial co...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These MLA Essay Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!