Why is there a Credibility gap between the two Waiters in 'A Clean, Well-Lighted Place?'

Name:
Instructor:
Analysis:
Date:
Credibility gap between the two waiters in A Clean, Well-Lighted Place
In most of his works, Ernest Hemingway usually employs non-objectivity. This is just to mean that he tries to bring out all the details about the story and the respective characters, and then leaves it up to the reader to make the judgments. He provides the raw facts then gives the reader the freedom to deliberate on them. In A Clean, Well-Lighted Place, he points out the bigger picture through issuing of small bits of information that the reader needs to add up so as to complete the larger picture .This story pits three characters; the two waiters and the customer, who is the old man. Through the exchanges between the two waiters and the customer, various traits and themes are brought out. There is a credibility gap between these two waiters in the story, as it is going to be discussed.
There is a definite disparity in the credibility of the two waiters, as evidenced by the manner in which they handled and talked about the old man. When an individual is born and goes through his or her youth, life seems to be perfect and smooth. It is only after living longer and acquiring the real life experiences that the individual realizes life is after all, not just a smooth sail. Once an individual understands this, it enables him to be more analytic of every situation that life poses.
The younger waiter is definitely not credible as compared to the older one. In his judgments, he portrays the rush that is common with so many young people. He has a job, a family and generally, ...