Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/β‰ˆ550 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
MLA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 7.2
Topic:

American Government: The historical perspective of the judicial branch

Essay Instructions:

You need to make sure you answer the essay questions as thoroughly as possible. The answer must be in sentence and paragraph format, no outlines. You need full sentences and college level writing (few, if any, writing errors). You will probably find the essay at least 1 1/2 pages. No plagiarism accepted. No cited page is necessary.
Answer the following questions:
Discuss the historical perspective of the judicial branch. (VA and NJ plans) Discuss the structure and jurisdiction of the courts as established by the Great Compromise, the Judiciary Act of 1789 and how it stands today. How does one become a federal court judge? What are some important qualities to have to become a judge? What is the term of office for a judge? Why? “Deciding to decide” is an important aspect of Supreme Court policy making. Discuss the process by which cases come and are decided in the Supreme Court. Do you agree or disagree the Court system undoes our representative democracy? Why or why not? If you could suggest one reform of the judiciary what would it be and why?

Essay Sample Content Preview:
Name:
Professor:
Subject:
Due date:
American government
The historical perspective of the judicial branch (VA &NJ plans)
The Virginia Plan proposed that the national judiciary comprise a supreme tribunal and inferior tribunals selected by the national legislature. Judges appointed by the president and confirmed by the US Senate would hold office and handle cases involving piracy, felonies in the seas, the capture of enemies, cases on foreigners, collection of revenue, national peace and harmony, and impeachment hearings national officials. On the other hand, the New Jersey Plan’s federal judiciary would comprise a Supreme Tribunal appointed by the federal executive. The judges would have jurisdiction over federal impeachment cases and final appeals on national matters such as treaties and ambassadors. Also, issues of capture by an enemy such as piracy and felonies.
The structure and jurisdiction of the courts as established by the Great Compromise, the Judicial Act of 1789, and how it stands today
The Great Compromise of 1787 judicial structure included a Supreme Tribunal, with federal judges appointed by the executive. The judges’ jurisdiction was on federal employees’ impeachment, appeals on national matters and treaties, felonies, and piracy cases. The Judiciary Act of 1789, which mirrors the current judicial system, established the U.S. judicial system comprising the district, circuit, and Supreme Courts. The district courts determined criminal and civil cases in their districts. The circuit courts served as the principal trial courts and exercised some appellate jurisdiction. The Supreme Court settled disagreements between states and reviewed final judgments, especially on treaties and statutes made by the highest courts in states.
How does one become a federal court judge?
The United States president appoints an individual to become a judge. The U.S Senate, guided by Article II of the constitution, then confirms them.
What are some important qualities to have to become a judge?
A judge should possess judicial temperament quality, which encompasses applying the law based on the facts and understanding of i...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These MLA Essay Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!