Theoretical issues in justice studies Law Essay Paper

From Michael Sandel's book, "Justice." In each chapter, he presents a series of issues as a way of presenting the major theories that have been proposed when considering how to "do the right thing" under different circumstances. For example, Chapter 2 presents Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill as major proponents of Utilitarianism. Chapter 3 presents Robert Nozick, a representative of Libertarianism. Chapter 5 presents Emanuel Kant and Deontology. And Chapter 6 presents John Rawls as the most recent proponent of "Liberal" social contract theory. In this way, we have been perpetually refining our definition of Justice by looking at it from a variety of perspectives and changing conditions. Now, it is time to apply these theories to the following hypothetical scenario:
You are the Chief of Police in your local town. You receive an emergency alert that the Hudson Nuclear Power Plant has exploded. You quickly go to the closest nuclear bomb shelter. In the growing chaos, you discover there is limited space inside, and you have only minutes before the nuclear radiation will arrive, wiping out all life in the tri-state area. You are asked to justify why YOU (and not the other leaders who will be arriving) should be admitted inside and allowed to survive. As a condition of entry, the guard wants to know how you will lead their future society after the nuclear disaster is over. Specifically, he asks you what perspective/principle would you recommend to ensure the renewal of a Just Society in that soon to be unknown future.
Adopt one of the theoretical perspectives we have previously discussed in class, define/describe the theory, and provide three reasons why you would adopt that school of thought as a first principle for your future society. Give at least one reference/example from the book to support each of your reasons. Then, provide at least one reason why you would NOT adopt each of the other main theories discussed in Chapters 1 through 6 of this book.