Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
MLA
Subject:
Education
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 7.92
Topic:

Supreme Court Decision for Education Freedom in the U.S

Essay Instructions:

Please read the directions to the fullest for it explain everything in great detail. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

 

Will The Supreme Court Decide For Education Freedom? By Star Parker The Supreme Court, in its new term, will hear a case that could remove a major barrier that stands between what our nation is today and what it can and should be. The case is Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. It’s about whether states can block use of public funds that parents use to pay for their children’s education in a religious school. We have already been down this road at the federal level. In 2002, the Supreme Court ruled in Zelman v. Simmons-Harris that there is no constitutional obstacle to parents accessing public funds available for education to pay for religious education for their children. The logic was crystal clear. The constitution prohibits government from mandating or establishing a particular religion. But if public funds for education are available for use by parents, and parents choose to use these funds to send their children to a religious school, it’s the parents, not the government, who make the decision. This cleared things up at the federal level. Now Espinoza can clear things up at the state level. Thirty-seven states have as part of their state constitution language known as the Blaine Amendment. Blaine Amendments prohibit the use of government funds for religious activity. They have been a major obstacle to state programs that wish to provide vouchers or tax credits to finance scholarships that can provide parents funds for any education they want for their children — including religious education. In the Espinoza case, the state of Montana enacted a tax credit program in 2015 that gave taxpayers credits for contributing to scholarship funds for parents to pay for education. The Montana Department of Revenue blocked use of these funds for religious schools, claiming that it violated Montana’s Blaine Amendment. The case made its way to the Montana Supreme Court, which threw out the whole program, claiming that allowing any of the funds provided through tax credits to go to religious schools violated the state constitution. Now the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case. A decision concluding that Blaine Amendment prohibitions blocking public funds for parental choice in education violates the U.S. Constitution’s protection of religious liberty will have huge nationwide repercussions. It will open the door to put freedom and responsibility for the education of children where it should be — with parents. The First Amendment of the Constitution is about protecting religious liberty. It is not about banning religion from American public life. Too often, in these confused times, it has been interpreted as the latter. Disproportionately, it is low-income minority children who have been the victims of absence of religious liberty in education. They are the ones most likely trapped in failing public schools with no way out. But this is about more than providing competition to public schools. It is about freedom. Parents should be able to decide what their children need and how they should be educated. I cannot think of anything more un-American than telling a parent that it is illegal for their children to learn the Ten Commandments in school, or learn that marriage is a critically important sacrament between one man and one woman, or that life is sacred from the beginning of its journey in the womb. And I cannot think of a more destructive institution than the teachers unions that are on the front lines fighting this most basic aspect of American freedom. Not only do unions fight freedom of education; they also use the public school monopoly as a platform to promote anti-religious, anti-Christian values, peddling a moral relativism that is destroying our country. All agree that education is critically important to every child’s future. Let’s hope that, finally, all American parents will be empowered with the most fundamental right to educate their children as they see fit. For source information to develop an in-text citation for this Star Parker article, click here. COPYRIGHT 2019 CREATORS.COM

Essay Sample Content Preview:
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Code/Title
Instructor
Date
Supreme Court Decision for Education Freedom in the U.S
The American Constitution is firm on the issue of accessing available public funds for payments for children's religious education. The Supreme Court was also clear in the Zelman V. Simmons-Harris case that was ruled in 2002 on the issue of the constitutional obstacle to parents accessing public funds available for education to pay for religious education for their children (Parker np). Furthermore, the American Constitution forbids the government from establishing or mandating any particular religion. It is, therefore, a parent’s choice to decide on a particular school to spend these available funds on their children’s education, regardless of the religion. It should not be the prerogative of the government to make this choice. This paper seeks to argue in favor of the Supreme Court’s decision to empower parents to spend public funds for education for their children since no clause in the Constitution prohibits it.
In a statement, Thomas Sowell stated that,
“If education is to be improved, no much emphasis should go to voting in the establishment of more schools, rather people should vote for transfer of decisions-making to parents” (Parker np).
This is a sure indication that the state should not meddle in the affairs of parents when deciding on how to spend public money on education. It was against the constitution; by the Supreme Court agreeing to hear the case, it was unquestionably the right constitutional direction (Parker np). According to Parker, The Blaine Amendment prohibitions are unfair to the low-income minority children who suffer because of the absence of liberty in religious education since they depend on scholarship programs. By denying them the right of choice, would be infringing on their right to basic education. The most suited people to make such a choice are parents because they have a right to know what is best for their children and the kind of education they should receive. Religion is a powerful tool that most parents use in shaping the character of their children because of the morals and values that religion stands for.
According to Parker (np), it is wrong for teachers to be at the forefront in the war on religion in support of education by supporting anti-Christian values, anti-religious and promoting moral relativism, which is destroying the social fabric of the cou...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These MLA Essay Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!