Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
8 pages/β‰ˆ2200 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
Harvard
Subject:
Management
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 38.88
Topic:

Scientific Management and Human Relations Essay Paper

Essay Instructions:

FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND LAW

Requirements:

 

Students need to answer two of the three questions. Each mini-essay should be 1,000 words long and students should write a total of 2,000 words.

 

The student can answer:

 

1. Critically evaluate whether the quality of work and employment is better under human relations management than scientific management. Justify your answer with references to the academic literature and business practice.

 

2. Analyse the mechanisms and the dynamics that determine forms of disciplinary power within organisations. Your answer should focus on a real-life organisation of your choice. 

 

3. Discuss the career aspirations and trajectories of young women and men in a sector of your own choice. Your answer should describe how intersectionality helps to articulate both experiences of oppressions and privileges in relation to your chosen context.

 

The marking criteria for the essay is as follow:

 

  • Comprehensiveness and accuracy of presenting the CMS literature and the organisation and the structure in presenting the key arguments and findings in answering the question
  • Critical analysis of the CMS literature based on own ideas and practical examples in answering the question
  • The relevance of the real-life example or examples chosen in answering the question
  • Presentational qualities of the Paper - citations, bibliography, paragraphing, spacing, spelling, Quotations etc.

 

All criteria are equally weighted.

 

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Scientific Management and Human Relations
Student
Institution
Course
Professor
Date
Scientific Management and Human Relations
Employees contribute a lot to the growth of an organization. Every organization takes time before employing the workers since it requires employees who would produce quality work. Quality work means the consistent achievement of expectations where there are healthy working conditions. It also means putting all the efforts forward every day to ensure the company's success is achieved. Employment, on the other side, is the process of recruiting new members into the organization. Evaluating whether the quality of work and employment is better under scientific management or human relation management can only be clearly explained after defining and discussing the various roles of relationship management and scientific management.
Lumen (2019) defines scientific management as analyzing workflows to improve labor productivity and economic efficiency. The scientific management principle was invented by a scientist called Taylor, who believed that workers could only be motivated by money. He advocated for pay as you earn formula if you work more and get more money. Taylor was a scientist who discovered that the output of work could be increased if people could be paid according to the workpieces; they have been able to execute each day. Scientific management is more concerned about the work output more than the motivation or satisfaction of employees. Lumen (2019) illustrates various scientific management principles that would help clarify if work quality and employment should fall under it. The first principle of scientific management advises on looking at each job scientifically and determining the best way to carry out the task. This principle favors the quality of work since work quality is defined as working consistently to achieve an organization's expectations. The best way to perform a task will help significantly improve work quality than focusing on workers' employment to perform the tasks.
The second principle of scientific management is hiring the right workers with the right skills for every task. After that, they should be trained to work maximum efficiency after hiring them. This principle shows that scientific management supports the quality of work. Specialized workers are employed to do a particular task, improving work quality because they focus their efforts and energy on clarity. Training of the workers helps in motivating them, thus performing a maximum efficiency. Monitoring the performance of workers and also providing instructions to them is the third principle of scientific management. Monitoring worker performance improves work quality since they are more careful when doing work since their performance is regularly monitored. Also, when job instructions are provided, there is a good workflow since every employee knows what he/she is doing. This principle improves work quality; the quality of work can only be achieved when there are clear set goals and work instructions.
According to Lumen (2019), the third principle of scientific management states that there should be the division of work between the management and labor; this is done to ensure the management plans...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These Harvard Essay Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!