Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
7 pages/≈1925 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
Harvard
Subject:
Business & Marketing
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 30.24
Topic:

Analysis of Low-cost Carriers

Essay Instructions:

This is a report, and I update two examples.

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Analysis of Low-cost carriers.
Candidate no:
Module no:
Reference no:
Date:
Q1
The main factors that have contributed to the success of low-cost carriers (LCC) are successful mergers, meeting the demand for low-ticket prices, and low cost of operations.
* Mergers and acquisitions have made it easier for the execution of the LCC business model. As a result, airlines have enhanced interline and codeshare networks consequently being capable of providing to growing markets. LCC’s incorporate smaller and more efficient aircraft to handle routes with longer distance, but thinner demand. The short-haul flights (usually point-to-point among secondary destinations) are accompanied by a flat and straightforward fare and class structure, no partnerships, direct sales, and use of new, single-model aircraft fleets. This is in stark contrast to the traditional business model, full-service carriers (FSC) which use a hub-and-spoke network, have complex fare structures, price discrimination in multiple service classes, partnerships with other airlines such as code sharing, multiple sales channels, and mixed aircraft fleets. The two different business models attract different types of travelers, such as infrequent or leisure travelers traveling mostly domestically or regionally for the LCC and business travelers and long-haul travelers for the FSC. The LCC business model has been attributed to the growth of such airlines in the Asian market. The LCC capacity share (percentage of total seats in the market) has risen from 3.3% in 2001 to 57.6% in October 2013 CITATION Bua15 \l 1033 (Buaphiban, 2015).
Below is a table that shows the difference in operation between full-service carriers (FSC) and low-cost carriers (LCC).

Full-service Carriers.

Low-Cost Carriers.

Business model

Global strategy and high cost

Niche strategy and low cost

Network

Global alliances

Point to point between secondary airports.

Fleet

Different types of planes

Standardization on similar models.

Product

Full service

Self-service

Sales Policy

Sales department
Distribution by GDS

Direct Sales
Call centers/Internet.

* Low-cost of operation is the main aim of the LCC business model which sees the use of a single manufacturer fleet type in its operation. As a result, there is a reduction in the number of pilot classes and smaller and manageable parts bin. This approach enables LCC’s to operate in airports that have lower landing slots and gate leasing costs. Low-cost airlines typically prefer the use of n high-density configuration aircraft to maximize their potential seat sales and profitability of the airline. For instance, Philippine Airlines a non-low-cost carrier can configure the Airbus A320 with 156 seat total, with 12 in first-class and A321s with 199 seats with 12 in first class. Cebu Pacific a low-carrier in the region can run the A320 with i80 seats total and A321s up to 230 seats. With such configurations, the low-cost carriers sell approximately 15% more seats in both the A320 and A321aircraft models CITATION Con18 \l 1033 (Slocum, 2018). Assuming the cost for fuel, crew and aircraft remain co...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These Harvard Essay Samples: