Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 12.96
Topic:

Genocide and the Nazi Holocaust

Essay Instructions:

Please answer the following questions separately, like each question has its own paragraph(s).
Use only the video below and the attached PDF only.
This site shows you where you can watch the documentary GENOCIDE:
https://www(dot)msn(dot)com/en-gb/entertainment/rf-watch-online/movies/genocide
In light of the documentary GENOCIDE and in light of the chapter by Peter Suedfeld, “Theories of the Holocaust: Trying to Explain the Unimaginable,” answer the following questions:
1. What general topic and time period the film cover?
2. Is the film impartial and objective or does it seem to be biased in any way
3. How does this film contribute to our knowledge of the Nazi Holocaust?
4. Read carefully Peter Suedfeld’s chapter. Which of the theories he presents to explain the causes of the Holocaust you subscribe to? Does this chapter help us understand the causes of other mass ethno political murder (Armenia, Cambodia, Rwanda, Bosnia, etc…)?

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Genocide and the Nazi Holocaust
Name
Affiliation
Course
Tutor
Genocide and the Nazi Holocaust
1 The film covers one of the worst crimes of the 20th century. It describes the 1994 genocide of Rwanda. The event entailed a deliberate killing of Rwandans, putting the country in a significantly terrifying moment. The documentary shows the citizens' challenges during the period, challenging its identification as one of history's worst events. According to the documentary, the Hutu military killed over 800 000 people. Most of the victims originated from the Tutsi minority, and the killers decided to evade justice by hiding in Europe. Although not identified, the film still investigates Kagame's role in shooting the president's (Habyarimana) plane in 1994. This action ought to be the cause of the genocide, questioning his claims of ending the killings. Eventually, Kagame's forces and their allies must have played a significant role in staging the war that ended up killing hundreds of people and violating human rights in Rwanda even in the 21st century. The genocide period describes the political and social situation in the country. The major endeavor in the documentary is identifying the issues surrounding the genocide. This case reveals Rwanda's history of violence as a legitimate event that required immediate attention and investigation to end the genocide.
2 Although the film is distinct and clear in explaining the genocide, its revision of the issue is biased in various ways. Eventually, the criticism shows significant partiality, deviating from the major aim of discussing the event. Instead of showing the conflict's actual complexity, it obscures the events, confusing the issues' identification. The obfuscating of the conflict's reality raises concerns for various groups of individuals, including the audience and even the actors presenting what the genocide was like in action. They are confused by various issues relating to the conflict. What was Kagame's role in the conflict? How did the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) take part in the conflict? Where the two responsible for the genocide and its impacts on Rwanda? The documentary should have focused on the RPF and Kagame's role in the violence, considering the factual evidence received during the conflict. Ignoring Kagame's role in the violence raises more questions on who sparked the former president's plane that seems the major cause of the genocide. However, it directed its substantial parts to raise doubts abo...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to holocaust:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!