Should All Officers Found Guilty of Deception be Subject to Termination?

Law Enforcement Deception and Department Actions
Your Name
Course and Section
Professor’s Name
March 8, 2023
To retain public trust and ensure that police are performing their tasks effectively and legally, accountability and integrity are crucial in law enforcement. Authorities that violate their regulations must be held accountable and disciplined. The judicial system can be weakened by law enforcement officials lying and deceiving the public, and the law enforcement agency's reputation can be damaged.
Depending on the gravity of the conduct and the agency's policies, firing may be the proper course of action when officers are found guilty of lying through internal administrative investigations. However, it is crucial to remember that every situation must be examined individually, and termination should not always result from lying. Whenever an authority figure disobeys a rule or regulation, there should be a disciplinary rule rather than a definitive termination because people can evolve and occasionally make mistakes.
Other alternative remedies include counseling, retraining, disciplinary action, or a mix. It is also critical to remember that an unbiased and fair inquiry process is necessary to ensure officers are held accountable for their conduct but not unfairly penalized. The ultimate goal of public policy should be to encourage openness, responsibility, and integrity within the legal system. To ensure that everyone receives a fair share of social justice, this may entail creating explicit policies and processes for looking into and dealing with cases of deceit, giving officers frequent training and education, and encouraging community involvement and oversight (Justice and Fairness - Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, n.d.).
Fairness in this situation must be judged individually and depends on several variables, including the seriousness of the offense, its context, and the specific policies and procedures in place within the law enforcement agency. In the end, the law of justice will determine the appropriate punishment. Generally, a claim can be made that officers who lie or deceive have betrayed the public's trust and disregarded their profession's ethical requirements. As a result, there ought to be repercussions for such actions (Webb, 2016).
Yeah, it is both feasible and unlikely since a decent cop would not act to break the law, and if they do, they should be interrogated to learn the real reasons for their actions. Following that, all of their actions will be evaluated to determine whether they were justified and carried out for the benefit of many people rather than just themselves. The agency may consider other types of discipline or remedial action, such as counseling or retraining, instead of dismissal when an officer commits a mistake or uses dishonest...