Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
5 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 12.15
Topic:

Nixon’s Trilateral Diplomacy v. Reagan’s 1982 National Security Strategy

Essay Instructions:

Please follow these instructions:Evaluate and Compare the Strategic Leadership behind Nixon’s Trilateral Diplomacy with China and Reagan’s 1982 National Security Strategy
Write a memo comparing and contrasting Nixon’s trilateral diplomacy with China and President Reagan’s 1982 National Security Strategy. This essay should contain an introduction and conclusion and must: a. Describe and compare the external challenge each leader faced and the overall method each used to address it; b. Describe and compare the domestic challenge each leader faced and the methods each used to overcome them. This essay must be written in prose, rather than bullets
References
I Nixon
a. Hal Brands, What Good is Grand Strategy, Excerpt from “Travails of the Heroic Statesman,” Chapter 2 pp. 59-76 (18 pages).
b. Henry Kissinger, Diplomacy, Simon & Schuster, 1994 “Foreign Policy as Geopolitics: Nixon’s Triangular Diplomacy,” Excerpt from Chapter 28, pp.703-732. (30 pages) c.
c.Terry Deibel, Foreign Affairs Strategy, Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Review “Evaluating Courses of Action,” Excerpt from Chapter 8 in “Coherence” section, pp. 353- 359 (7 pages)
d. Kurt Campbell and Ely Ratner, “The China Reckoning: How Beijing Defied American Expectation,” Foreign Affairs, Mar/April 2018, Vol 97, issue 2, pp. 60-70 (7 pages).
e. Warren Cohen, “Chinese Lessons: Nixon, Mao and the Course of US Chinese Relations,” Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007, Vol 86, Issue 2. (5 pages)
II Reagan
a. Peter Schweizer, Victory: The Reagan Administration’s Secret Strategy that Hastened the Collapse of the Soviet Union (New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 1994), pp. xviii-xix and 281-284. (6 pages)
b. Hal Brands, What Good Is Grand Strategy? (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 2014), Chapter 3: “Was There a Reagan Grand Strategy: American Statecraft in the Late Cold War,” pp. 102-143. (42 pages)
c. NSDD 32: U.S. National Security Strategy, May 20, 1982 and NSDD 75: U.S. Relations with the USSR. (17 pages)

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Comparative Strategic Leadership: Evaluate and Compare the Strategic Leadership behind Nixon’s Trilateral Diplomacy with China and Reagan’s 1982 National Security Strategy
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Comparative Strategic Leadership
Memorandum
To: The Lecturer
From: Political Science Student
Date: 7th Sept. 2018
Subject: Comparative Strategic Leadership
Strategic leadership is not a new term when it comes to the history of the United States. Leaders like President Nixon and Reagan have successfully used this leadership style to pursue the goals and interests of the United States in the era of the Cold War which threatened the supremacy of the United States and global peace. Strategic leadership is a type of leadership style where the leader envisions the future of a country and goes ahead to influence others within the country and beyond for the common good of meeting national interests (Kurt & Elly, 2018). While the era of the Cold War was an acid test for the leadership styles of Nixon and Reagan, the two leaders uniquely used opposite approaches to secure the nation and ensure its prosperity at the time when communism was endangering the security of the Americans. Nixon used trilateral diplomacy while Reagan employed National Security Strategy to overcome external and internal challenges that affected the nation during his era. This essay compares and contrasts challenges (both external and internal) that Nixon and Reagan faced and how they strategically positioned the United States to navigate their political challenges.
External Challenges faced by each Leader and the Overall Strategy used.
Nixon and Reagan faced different external challenges. Nixon’s main challenge was the onset of the Vietnam War in 1960 which came as a test to his leadership style. France withdrew after the U.S joining the war and thousands of American soldiers died on the battlefield. Pressure at home forced the U.S to exit the War (Terry, 2007). It became even worse when Nixon had to struggle to contain communism in the region. The main problem during Nixon’s time is that he was facing two main enemies, the Soviet Union and China. To address this problem, Nixon used triangular diplomacy which culminated to his visit in China in 1972 (Kurt & Elly, 2018). Nixon, with the help of his adviser Henry Kissinger, devised Triangular Diplomacy strategy to exploit advantages for the U.S in the era of the Cold War. The United States had historically failed to recognize the existence of the communist Chinese government under the leadership of Mao. The animosity was quelled when Nixon surprised everyone by announcing his visit to China in 1972. The visit made the Soviet Union question the loyalty of the Chinese government to the communist regime, hence easing the pressure that the Americans wer...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to vietnam war:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!