Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Life Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 7.92
Topic:

Recycling material in building Life Sciences Essay

Essay Instructions:

Write a background about Analyzing Recycling Materials in America and Chinese Building construction
Background writing: Introduce the background of the theme in your own words.
(We already have 10 related paper resources from the upload file)and website: https://archive(dot)epa(dot)gov/region9/waste/archive/web/html/casestud.html)
Important Research area: Building Construction Management
My research topic: Analyzing Recycling Materials in America and Chinese Building construction
Related topic: How many recycled materials can be used in building construction projects?
Research related area Waste management, Sustainable material in building construction, BIM in construction, Recycle in Construction


 


The Proportion of Recycled Materials in Building Construction Projects


https://archive.epa.gov/region9/waste/archive/web/html/casestud.html


 


 



Srinivasan, R.S., Campbell, D.E., Wang, W., 2015. Renewable substitutability index: maximizing renewable resource use in buildings. Buildings 5, (2), pp.581-596.https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings5020581



 



Title:



Renewable Substitutability Index: Maximizing Renewable Resource Use in Buildings



Research aim and objectives:



To examine the development of a Renewable Substitutability Index (RSI) designed to maximize the use of renewable resources in a building as well as quantifying the substitution process using solar emergy.



Data collection methods used:



RSI assessment methodology for calculation of the RSI values



Main findings



A higher RSI achieves a low-energy building strategy promoting a higher order of sustainability by optimizing the use of renewables over a building’s lifetime from formation-extraction-manufacturing to maintenance, operation, demolition, and recycle.



Limitations of the study:



            Lack of an elaborate database of building materials’ specific emergy values with accurate data on renewable resource use.



Directions for future research:



Calculation of the Renewable Substitutability of energy sources requires additional effort to provide location-specific values.



 



Srour, I.M., Chehab, G.R., and Gharib, N., 2012. Recycling construction materials in a developing country: four case studies. International Journal of Engineering Management and Economics 2, 3(1-2), pp.135-151.



 



Title:



Recycling construction materials in a developing country: four case studies



Research aim and objectives:



To identify and assesses the existing levels of awareness and implementation of sustainability practices amongst the different participants in the Lebanese construction industry



Data collection methods used:



Case study survey methodology



Main findings:



The results indicate an acceptable level of awareness, but a mediocre level of implementation of sustainable practices, which were limited to green design efforts and uncoordinated attempts at recycling construction demolition materials.



Limitations of the study:



Lack of clear legal procedures



Directions for future research:



Stakeholder level of awareness



 



Ajayi, S.O., Oyedele, L.O., Bilal, M., Akinade, O.O., Alaka, H.A., and Owolabi, H.A., 2017. Critical management practices influencing on-site waste minimization in construction projects. Waste management, 59, pp.330-339.



 



Title:



Critical Management Practices Influencing On-site Waste Minimization in Construction Projects



Research aim and objective



To explore critical management practices capable of influencing on-site waste minimization



Data collection methods used:



Descriptive statistics and exploratory factor analysis



Main findings:



Site management functions could significantly reduce waste generation


 



Limitations of the study:



Adequate data from professionals, costly



Directions for future research:



Further studies could evaluate the generalizability of the findings to other regions since this study was limited to the UK



 



Udawatta, N., Zuo, J., Chiveralls, K., and Zillante, G., 2015. Improving waste management in construction projects: An Australian study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 101, pp.73-83.



 



Title:



Improving waste management in construction projects: An Australian study



Research aim and objectives:



To determine effective approaches to eliminate and/or minimize waste generation in construction projects



Data collection methods used:



Mixed methods approach



Main findings



The findings reveal twenty-six critical solutions for waste management



Limitations of the study:



Cultural context and geographical location



Directions for future research:



Further research opportunities exist to explore how these solutions can be applied in different project types with different procurement methods and other stakeholder groups



 


 



Roth, L., 2005. Reuse of construction materials: Environmental performance and assessment methodology (Doctoral dissertation, Institutionen för konstruktions-och produktionsteknik).



 



Title:



Reuse of construction materials - Environmental performance and assessment methodology



Research aim and objectives



To examine under which conditions reuse of construction materials in the Swedish building and transportation sectors is beneficial to the environment



Data collection methods used:



Environmental assessment methods



Main findings:



The environmental performance of reuse could be beneficial under certain specific conditions



Limitations of the study



Application of narrow system boundaries excluded the potential benefits of reuse



Directions for future research:



Implications on construction materials, when addressed properly in the future would contribute more knowledge concerning the recycling of construction materials



 



Giesekam, J., Barrett, J.R., and Taylor, P., 2016. Construction sector views on low carbon building materials. Building Research & Information, 44(4), pp.423-444.



 



Title:



Construction sector views on low carbon building materials



Research aim and objectives



To understand the economic, technical, practical, and cultural barriers preventing construction professionals from selecting a variety of materials commonly identified as being lower in embodied carbon



Data collection methods used:



Qualitative mixed-method approach, survey, and series of semi-structured interviews



Main findings:



The identified barriers potentially prevent alternative material choice as a means of mitigating embodied carbon emissions



Limitations of the study:



The study population fell below required standards, poor response from professionals



Directions for future research:



Much additional data gathering is needed to develop robust project level benchmarks. Further research is also required to resolve the debate around the most appropriate means of regulating embodied carbon, and detailed proposals require development



 


 



Adams, K.T., Osmani, M., Thorpe, T., and Thornback, J., 2017, February. Circular economy in construction: current awareness, challenges, and enablers. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Waste and Resource Management (Vol. 170, No. 1, pp. 15-24). Thomas Telford Ltd. 



 



Title:



Circular economy in construction: current awareness, challenges, and enablers



Research aim and objectives:



To provide an indication of the awareness levels of circular economy in the construction sector



Data collection methods used:



The quantitative approach, in the form of an online survey and a qualitative approach



Main findings:



Despite the existence of an industry-wide awareness of the concept, clients, designers, and subcontractors are the least informed, which provides a key challenge for greater adoption.



Limitations of the study:



A larger obstacle is the existing stock of buildings and infrastructure where circularity principles have not been adopted.



Directions for future research:



Further research required on the elaborate recovery of materials



 



Gangolells, M., Casals, M., Forcada, N., and Macarulla, M., 2014. Analysis of the implementation of effective waste management practices in construction projects and sites. Resources, conservation, and recycling93, pp.99-111. 



 



Title:



Analysis of the implementation of effective waste management practices in construction projects and sites



Research aim and objectives:



To better understand the current status of construction and demolition waste management in construction projects and sites.



Data collection methods used:



The quantitative method by means of closed questions survey



Main findings:



The most commonly implemented practices included on-site cleanliness alongside order, appropriate storage of raw materials, as well as prioritization of the nearest authorized waste managers



Limitations of the study:



Limited responses from professionals



Directions for future research:



Future research on the analysis of the adequacy of the reuse and recycling capacity of the construction waste management facilities. Use larger sample size and diversity in order to be able to study the influence of the respondent’s role



 


Essay Sample Content Preview:

Recycling Material in Building
Student Name
Institution Affiliation
Background of the study
Construction and demolition wastes (CDW) are causing a serious environmental problem in many large cities. Enormous infrastructure and buildings are constructed every day around the globe, and the number of demolished structures is also increasing in the construction sector. A report by Transparency market research (2018) stated that the daily volume of generated construction waste will nearly double to 2.2billion tons by the year 2025. The construction and demolition recycling report classifies construction waste as materials from evacuation, demolition, roadwork, and complex materials such as plastics, cardboard, metal and ceramic, wood, gypsum, asphalt, and concrete (Slowey, 2018).
Construction activities generate a large amount of waste compared to other industries. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) report, it is estimated that 600 million tons of construction and demolition debris were generated in the U.S. alone in 2018, which is double the volume generated from municipal solid waste. In China, construction and demolition debris accounts for approximately 30% to 40% of the total amount of waste generated. However, these two countries are struggling with recycling and management of waste from construction and demolition, yet they can do 70 to 90% recycling rate (Huang et al., 2018).
The situation of CDW management in china is 5% while in the US it stands at 30%. The existing barrier to low rates in china is as a result of the insufficient legal framework, lack of developed recycling market, and the tendency of building designs not paying attention to reducing waste (2018). The low cost of readily available raw materials hinders large economic incentives for the management of CDW in the U.S. (Giorgi et al., 2018). Considering that there is awareness to promote the management of CDW through the 3R principle that advocates for reduction, ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to scientific essays:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!