Concept of Justice: Aristotle's Distributive and Procedural justice

Concept of Justice
Name
Course
Instructor name
Date
Concept of Justice
In criminal justice, justice is a crucial idea in the overall perspective. Authorities throughout the world have taken a vow to protect and defend the people they serve. Some people believe that certain police officers are breaking their vow and should be reprimanded. People and families seek justice for wrongdoings committed against them, although this is not always done correctly. The above study will examine the differences between substantive and procedural justice and how procedural justice influences false convictions and moral impressions of systemic racism. Aristotle's ethical notions of distributive and procedural fairness will be explained in this presentation. Finally, this study will discuss how crime and criminal justice institutions interpret and interpret justice.
Aristotle's Ethical Ideas of Distributive and Procedural justice
Distributive justice is described as the allocation of liberties, responsibilities, and possessions per the individual's personal qualities and in the best interests of society. Procedural justice is defined as the idea of equality in dispute resolution and resource allocation procedures. Justice is the most fundamental ethical attribute in Aristotle's political ideology. In his political ideology, Aristotle discusses justice and administering them. Because of Aristotle's theory, we now identify justice with enforcing the rules, equitably distributing commodities, and dealing with criminal justice in the proper legal manner (Vosen, 2021, p. 300). Aristotle compares and contrasts two types of justice. The first type of argument on justice is distributive justice, which focuses on the equitable distribution of state resources between a society's many members. We have a pretty limited quantity of commodities as a nation. We must think about how those commodities should be allocated fairly. Since fairness is the final measure for deciding who receives what, all citizens will give goods equally due to the apparent variable concentrations of necessity. Corrective justice, which is another way of describing procedural justice, is the other type of justice. The mechanism through which societal groupings institutionalize the implementation of remedial and distributing justice criteria to specific circumstances is the subject of Aristotle's "procedural justice" argument. Rawls' law definition stated that civilization must seek equality and fairness in opportunities. Where unfairness occurs, societal norms must be written to benefit those with the fewest resources. Plato claims that constructing justice is a reasonable arrangement where each component does its function and must not be tampered with. According to Aristotle, justice is defined as what is legal and equitable (Vosen, 2021, p. 305). Corrective justice may be necessary when an individual of the society has indeed been unjustly enriched or burdened with more or less than is due to social allocations, such as by a legal proceeding. According to Plato and Aristotle, Justice strives to treat people like they are all the very same, even when they are not. The above is the standard for us because we have been trained on these forms of fairness our entire existe...