Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
1 page/β‰ˆ275 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Law
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 4.32
Topic:

Commonwealth v. Pullis and Commonwealth v. Hunt

Essay Instructions:

Discussion questions: Commonwealth v. Pullis and Commonwealth v. Hunt
Answer any one question about Patrick Grubbs, “Cordwainers Trial of 1806,” The Encyclopedia of Greater Philadelphia, Rutgers University-Camden, https://philadelphiaencyclopedia(dot)org/archive/cordwainers-trial-of-1806/
Why did journeymen cordwainers (shoemakers) in Philadelphia form the Federal Society of Journeymen Cordwainers in 1794? What strategies did they use to meet their objectives?
Why did the masters (the cordwainers’ employers) take the member of the Federal Society to court?
What were the roles of federalist and democratic-republican politics during the Commonwealth v. Pullis trial?
Answer both questions about Commonwealth v. Pullis and Commonwealth v. HuntDownload Commonwealth v. Pullis and Commonwealth v. Hunt
In Commonwealth v. Pullis (1806), what were the main arguments the judge made in his instructions to the jury?
What were the main arguments Chief Justice Shaw made in Commonwealth v. Hunt (1842)? How did his ruling differ from Commonwealth v. Pullis?

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Commonwealth v. Pullis and Commonwealth v. Hunt
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course name & number
Professor
Due date
Why did journeymen Cordwainers (shoemakers) in Philadelphia form the Federal Society of Journeymen Cordwainers in 1794? What strategies did they use to meet their objectives?
According to Patrick Grubbs, shoemakers started the Federal Society to protect journeymen workforce from employees who would agree to work for low pay, known as “scab labor.” Also, they sought to protect their wages by pushing for a raise with increased orders. The society achieved these two objectives by organizing several strikes, which stopped production and led to defaulting shoe and boot orders, thereby making the masters give in to their demands (Grubbs, n.d.).
In Commonwealth v. Pullis (1806), what were the main arguments the judge made in his instructions to the jury?
The judge argued that the case before the court was to determine whether the combination of workers was guilty of pushing for their wages to benefit themselves and harm those not members of their society. The judge argued that the law condemned the two aspects, binding the court ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples: