Strategies to Use in New Practice as Advance Practice Nurse

Topic 2 DQ 2
What strategies will you use in your new practice as an advance practice nurse to review and critique literature pertinent to your practice?
BELOW IS Example from class mate
Re:Topic 2 DQ 2
As an advance practice nurse, reviewing of literature that is pertinent to the nursing practice is exceedingly critical. This helps a nurse in ensuring that he/she is conversant with the right literature in his/her field. One of the strategies that can be used in reviewing and critiquing literature that is relevant to the area of practice entails developing questions that would assist in the review and critique of the literature (Bettany-Saltikov, 2012). The development of well-focused questions is an important strategy that can help in the review and critique of literature. Questions are important in acting as a guide to searching the literature that one is interested in. Having focused questions is likely to offer an excellent start for reviewing and critiquing literature in the field of nursing (Bettany-Saltikov, 2012). Therefore, developing questions emerge as an important strategy for reviewing and critiquing literature in the field of nursing.
Another strategy that can be used in the review and critique of pertinent literature in the field entails checking the source of the information. The source of information or literature is very vital because it helps in determining the credibility of the information. Thus, it is possible to critique and review literature depending on the credibility of a source. Depending on the credibility of a source, it is feasible to establish the reliability of literature in the field (Bettany-Saltikov, 2012). For instance, literature from some sources such as the internet may not be considered as reliable since individuals may have different opinions regarding a certain issue and may express this information on the internet. Therefore, through checking the source of literature, one can be in a position to review and critique relevant literature in the field.
Reference
Bettany-Saltikov, J. (2012). How To Do A Systematic Literature Review In Nursing: A Step-By-Step Guide. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
2 posts
Re:Topic 2 DQ 2
Nurses use research to answer questions about their practice, solve problems, improve the quality of patient care, generate new research questions, and shape health policy. Nurses who confront questions about practice and policy need strong, high-quality, evidence-based research. Research articles in peer-reviewed journals typically undergo a rigorous review process to ensure scholarly standards are met. Nonetheless, standards vary among reviewers and journals.
When deciding to read an article, I will determine if it's about a question I have an interest in or if it can be of use in my practice. I will have a research article available to read and critique as I consider the following questions.
1. Does the title accurately describe the article?
A good title will pique my interest, that is, after I completely read the article. An informative title conveys the article's key concepts, methods, and variables.
2. Is the abstract representative of the article?
The abstract provides a brief overview of the purpose of the study, research questions, methods, results, and conclusions. This helps me decide if it's an article that I want to read.
3. Does the introduction make the purpose of the article clear?
A good introduction provides the basis for the article. It includes a statement of the problem, a rationale for the study, and the research questions. When a hypothesis is being tested, it should be clearly stated and include the expected results.
4. Is a theoretical framework described?
When a theoretical framework is used, it should inform the study and provide a rationale. The concepts of the theoretical framework should relate to the topic and serve as a basis for interpreting the results.
5. Is the literature review relevant to the study and comprehensive? Does it include recent research?
The literature review provides a context for the study. It establishes what is, and is not known about the research problem. Publication dates are important but there are caveats.
6. Does the methods section explain how a research question was addressed?
The methods section provides enough information to allow the study to be replicated. Components of this section indicate if the design is appropriate to answer the research question(s).
7. Did the researcher select the correct sample to answer the research questions and was the size sufficient to obtain valid results?
If a data collection instrument was used, how was it created and validated? If any materials were used, such as written guides or equipment, were they described? How were data collected? Was reliability and validity accounted for? Were the procedures listed in a step-by-step manner? Independent and dependent variables should be described and terms defined. For example, if patient falls in the hospital are considered the dependent variable, or outcome, what are the independent variables, or factors, being investigated that may influence the rate at which patient falls occur? In this example, independent variables might include nurse staffing, registered nurse composition (such as education and certification), and hospital Magnet status.
8. Is the analytical approach consistent with the study questions and research design?
The analytical approach relates to the study questions and research design. A quantitative study may use descriptive statistics to summarize the data and other tests, such as chi squares, t-tests, or regression analysis, to compare or evaluate the data. A qualitative study may use such approaches as coding, content analysis, or grounded theory analysis.
9. Are the results presented clearly in the text and in tables and figures?
Results should be clearly summarized in the text, tables, and figures.
10. Are the limitations presented and It is essential that the limitations of the study be presented.
These are the factors that explain why the results may need to be carefully interpreted, may only be generalized to certain situations, or may provide less robust results than anticipated. Examples of limitations include a low response rate to a survey, not being able to establish causality when a cross-sectional study design was used, and having key stakeholders refuse to be interviewed.
11. Does the discussion explain the results in relation to the theoretical framework, research questions, and significance of the study?
The discussion serves as an opportunity to explain the results in respect to the research questions and the theoretical framework.
Reference:
Kaplan, L. (2012). Reading and critiquing a research article.
Retrieved on May 10, 2016 from https://americannursetoday(dot)com/reading-and-critiquing-a-research-article/