Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
1 page/≈550 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 9.72
Topic:

Motivations of Physicians and Nurses to Perform Euthanasia

Essay Instructions:

Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
Chapter 5, “Critically Appraising Quantitative Evidence for Clinical Decision Making” (pp. 124–188)
Chapter 6, “Critically Appraising Qualitative Evidence for Clinical Decision Making” (pp. 189–218)
Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010a). Evidence-based practice step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part I. American Journal of Nursing, 110(7), 47–52. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000383935.22721.9c. Retrieved from https://journals(dot)lww(dot)com/ajnonline/Fulltext/2010/07000/Evidence_Based_Practice_Step_by_Step__Critical.26.aspx
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010b). Evidence-based practice, step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part II: Digging deeper—examining the “keeper” studies. American Journal of Nursing, 110(9), 41–48. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000388264.49427.f9. Retrieved from https://www(dot)nursingcenter(dot)com/nursingcenter_redesign/media/EBP/AJNseries/Critical2.pdf
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010c). Evidence-based practice, step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part III: The process of synthesis: Seeing similarities and differences across the body of evidence. American Journal of Nursing, 110(11), 43–51. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000390523.99066.b5. Retrieved from https://www(dot)nursingcenter(dot)com/nursingcenter_redesign/media/EBP/AJNseries/Critical3.pdf
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Williamson, K. M. (2009). Evidence-based practice: Critical appraisal of qualitative evidence. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 15(3), 202–207. doi:10.1177/1078390309338733. Retrieved from http://citeseerx(dot)ist(dot)psu(dot)edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1022.62&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Document: Critical Appraisal Tools (Word document)
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Appraising the Research [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Accessible player
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Interpreting Statistics [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Accessible player
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Review of research: Hierarchy of evidence pyramid [Mutlimedia file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Schulich Library McGill. (2017, June 6). Types of reviews [Video file]. Retrieved from https://youtu(dot)be/5Rv9z7Mp4kg
Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Critical Appraisal of Research
Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.
Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.
In this Assignment, you will use appraisal tools to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and consider the importance of critically appraising research evidence.
Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.
Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tools document provided in the Resources.
The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research
Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tools document. Be sure to include:
An evaluation table
A levels of evidence table
An outcomes synthesis table
Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research
Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Full citation of selected article Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4 Stajduhar, K., Sawatzky, R., Cohen, S.R., Heyland, D.K., Allan, D., Bidgood, D.,…Gadermann, A.M. (2017). Bereaved family members’ perceptions of the quality of end-of-life care across four types of inpatient care settings. BMC Palliative Care, 16, 59, doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0237-5.
Vézina-Im, L. A., Lavoie, M., Krol, P., & Olivier-D'Avignon, M. (2014). Motivations of physicians and nurses to practice voluntary euthanasia: a systematic review. BMC Palliative Care, 13(1), 20-37. Kasper, R., Sigrid, S., & Fredydy, M. (2011). Is continuous sedation at the end of life an ethically preferable alternative to physician-assisted suicide? American Journal of Bioethics, 11(6), 32-40 Ettema, E., Gijsbers van Wijk, C., Hulst S., & Widdershoven, G. (2019). Experiences and wishes of family members regarding their involvement in dealing with a psychiatric patient's request for termination of life. A checklist for physicians. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie, 61(1), 32-40Conceptual Framework Describe the theoretical basis for the study Variation in the level of satisfaction with end of life (EOL) care among bereaved families (Stajduhar et al., 2017). 
Motivations among healthcare professionals to carry out euthanasia (Vézina-Im, Lavoie, Krol, & Olivier-D'Avignon, 2014) Ethics of continuous sedation vs. physician assisted suicide in end of life (EOL) care (Kasper, Sigrid, & Fredydy, 2011) Family members’ involvement in euthanasia Design/Method Describe the designand how the studywas carried out Survey of deceased family members whose loved ones had passed on in intensive care units extended care units, medical care units, and palliative care units (Stajduhar et al., 2017). Review of publications in different databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, FRANCIS, and ProQuest (Vézina-Im, Lavoie, Krol, & Olivier-D'Avignon, 2014) Opinions from respected authorities Focus group with family membersSample/Setting The number andcharacteristics ofpatients,attrition rate, etc. Members of patients in intensive care units (ICU) (n=30), extended care units (ECU) (n=63), medical care units (MCU) (n=140), palliative care units (n=155) (Stajduhar et al., 2017).
Countries legalizing euthanasia physicians, nurses, and general healthcare professionals (Vézina-Im, Lavoie, Krol, & Olivier-D'Avignon, 2014) End of life (EOL) patients 1st focus group: 7 family members aged between 18 and 65 years2nd focus group: 5 family members aged between 18 and 65 yearsMajor Variables StudiedList and define dependent and independent variables Depended variable: Satisfaction with the quality of EOL care Independent variables: Patients dying in different settings of care, demographic ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to physician assisted suicide:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!