Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
3 pages/β‰ˆ825 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 12.96
Topic:

Critique of Research Studies Instructions 2 Health, Medicine Essay

Essay Instructions:

Instruction for part 2
Follow the instructions provided in "Critique of Research Studies Instructions."
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Critique of Research Studies – Part 2: Due Topic 6
For Part 2 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article:
Quantitative Qualitative
• Method • Method
o Protection of human rights o Protection of participants’ rights
o Research design o Research design and research tradition
o Population and sample o Sample and setting
o Data collection and measurement o Data collection
o Procedures o Procedures
o Enhancement of trustworthiness•
Rubric for the critique research writing
Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for all five sections of quantitative methods OR the critique is thorough but is missing a component. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for all six sections of qualitative methods OR the critique is thorough but is missing a component. Critique is supported with relevant evidence
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style is usually correct.

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Critique of Research Studies- Part 2
Name
Institution
Critique of Research Studies- Part 2
Quantitative Research Critique
Method
Protection of Human Rights
The study by Pace et al. (2012) did not require any human participants as subjects of the study because the main focus was on testing the reliability of the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool (MMAT). The only participants in the study are the reviewers, who were not subjected to any harm since they are willing participants. There is no indication that the study was approved by an ethics review board.
Research Design
Comparisons were made before and after the discussions between the reviewers to determine the reliability of the MMAT. This is relevant in a study to facilitate interpretation of findings, as opined by Polit and Beck (2012). However, it is not clear which research design was adopted in the study; neither is the minimization of biases demonstrated.
Population and Sample
The study population in the study by Pace et al. (2012) included all Participatory Research (PR) evaluation studies, and 32 PR studies were selected as the study’s sample. Polit and Beck (2012) opine that the population and the sample used in a quantitative study should be clearly described. Further, any sampling biases should be effectively minimized, and it is not clear in the study by Pace et al. (2012) how sampling bias was minimized. It is also not clear what sampling design was adopted in the study or how the researchers settled on the sample size. A power analysis was not used in the estimation of the needs of the sample size. Power analysis is an important aspect of sample size determination, as recommended by Polit and Beck (2012).
Data Collection and Measurement
Details about data measurement scales are thoroughly provided in the study. The researchers collected data from the reviewers' pre and post discussion to determine the efficiency of the MMAT. A pilot study was first conducted before the actual data was collected to determine the validity and reliability of the measures. As noted by Polit and Beck (2012), it is important to indicate the reliability and validity of measure in a quantitative study. The evidence of the reliability and validity of the measures came from the research itself through the pilot study, which provided the researcher an opportunity to make some improvements on the MMAT.
Procedures
The intervention considered in the study by Pace et al. (2012) was the discussion between the reviewers and data was collected pre and post discussion. However, the intervention is not thoroughly described, as recommended by Polit and Beck (2012). Further, every reviewer was involved in the discussion, and their responses were calculated using SPSS’s kappa statistic to determine their level of agreement on the reliability and efficiency of the tool.
Qualitative Research Critique
Method
Protection of Participants Rights
The study by Cruz and Higginbottom (2013) is mo...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now