Responds to Critical Evaluation of a Nutrition Website Coursework

This is the Part 2 of Critical Evaluation of a Nutrition Website. It relates to the order 00111334 (you've done several days ago).

Part 2: Respond to Three Classmates' Posts

After you have published your original post, read other posts in your group and then respond to at least three classmates’ original posts to engage in a dialogue with your peers. The expected length is 2-4 sentences for each of three original posts.

It is recommended that you start this part of the assignment by visiting the original website chosen by each of your three classmates. Then, read and respond to their original posts. The intention of your response is to start a dialogue by pointing out additional reasons why you think this source is or is not credible. You can also suggest ways in which the site could be improved (e.g., Are there information or sources the site authors could have added? Are there different messages that would be more appropriate?).

To earn full marks for this assignment, respond to at least three other original posts. Your posts should significantly contribute to the conversation, rather than simply be a “me too” response. Remember, the purpose of this assignment is to think critically and engage in a dialogue.