Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/β‰ˆ550 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Coursework
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 11.66
Topic:

Integrity: Key Players in Healthcare Delivery

Coursework Instructions:

Discussion: Integrity: Key Players
The U.S. health care system is unique in comparison to health care systems in other industrialized countries. According to the Commonwealth Fund Analysis (2017), the United States ranks 11 in overall health care system performance. For the Module 1 Discussion, view the chart with rankings by the Commonwealth Fund (link below) and choose two countries from the noted list. Research each country's health care system and compare and discuss three differences within each system, compared with the United States delivery system. Based on your findings, discuss two recommendations that may be useful for adoption by the United States for improvement.
Review the rankings of health systems.
Your posts will be graded on how well they meet the Discussion Requirements posted in the "Before You Begin" section. Please review this section as well as the discussion scoring rubric.
Rubrics
BSHLS MSHLS MSHA Discussion grading rubric - Timeliness v1

Coursework Sample Content Preview:

Integrity: Key Players in Healthcare Delivery
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course
Tutor
Date
Integrity: Key Players in Healthcare Delivery
Introduction
Despite exceeding average expenditure on healthcare services, the United States ranks poorly among its counterparts. According to a survey conducted by the Commonwealth Fund, the United States ranks last out of the eleven countries involved in the survey (Schneider et al., 2021). The ranking is based on the following aspects access to care, care processes, administrative efficiency, equity and health outcomes. According to the Commonwealth Fund, Norway ranks in the first place and the United Kingdom ranks in the 4th place (Schneider et al., 2021). By comparing Norway’s and United Kingdom’s healthcare systems performances to that of the United States, this report recommends changes that the United States should adopt in the future.
Comparison
One of the most important measures of performance is access to healthcare. While the United States ranks last, Norway ranks second, and the United Kingdom ranks fourth on how accessible healthcare services are to members of the population. Both Norway and the United Kingdom have in place a national fund that ensures overall contribution towards healthcare (commonwealth Fund, 2015). On the other hand, in the United States, many individuals are unable to afford care services, especially those with little to no income. Residents of the United States face more difficulties in meeting bills as compared to residents in the United Kingdom and Norway.
Another vital measure of healthcare is administrative efficiency. As the United States ranks last, Norway and the United Kingdom rank 1st and 4th, respectively (Schneider et al., 2021). Administrative efficiency reflects on the ability to gain access to important patient data and use it to make decisions. In the United States, caregivers tend to face many challenges in obtaining information relevant to understanding patient history. The Norway system is considered one of the most effective in communication; with a well-established means of communicating; especially when the patient needs are complex (Laugesen, 2021). Similarly, the centralization of the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom has led to the administrative function consuming less time consuming and more focus on quality care provisions.
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Coursework Samples: