Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
4 pages/≈1100 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Business & Marketing
Type:
Coursework
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 23.33
Topic:

Branding and Competitive Strategies’ Impact on Consumer Choice and Bargaining Power

Coursework Instructions:

Review the Case Study document.
Assume upper management of the organization is interested in understanding the impact its branding and competitive strategies have on consumer choice, as well as the impact of the bargaining power of consumers in the health care market, especially on your products and services.
Prepare a 1,050-word summary of branding and competitive strategies’ impact on consumer choice and bargaining power on ECRHS.
Part I: Branding Strategy Impact
Analyze the impact that the current ECRHS brand has on consumer choice of its products and services. In your analysis, consider the following:
What is the current branding strategy of ECRHS?
How are the organization and its brand(s) perceived in the market?
Are there any negative impacts of legal cases against the organization within the community or its consumers? How might this impact their choice of a health care provider?
How have your acquisitions of other health care facilities impacted your brand image and hence consumer choice of your organization?
How has your handling of the COVID-19 pandemic impacted your brand image?
What impact do your branding strategies have on consumer choice and bargaining power?
Part II: Competitive Strategies Impact
Analyze the impact that the current ECRHS competitors have on consumer choice of its products and services. In your analysis, consider the following:
Who are the 3 largest competitors, and how do their offerings differ from those of ECRHS?
What share of the market do the competitors hold?
What are the threats of new entrants to the market and the organization?
What is the threat of competitive/substitute products/services to the organization?
What is the bargaining power of customers in the market?
How does this bargaining power impact consumer choice in the market and for ECRHS?

Coursework Sample Content Preview:

Branding and Competitive Strategies’ Impact on Consumer Choice and Bargaining Power
Author’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Code and Name
Professor’s Name
Date
Branding and Competitive Strategies’ Impact on Consumer Choice and Bargaining Power
The East Chestnut Regional Health System (ECRHS) is a merger of Archway Hospital (AH), Northern Mountain Hospital Consortium (NMHC), and East River Medical Center (ERMC). The paper analyzes the competitive and branding strategies that affect consumer choice and bargaining power on ECRHS.
Part I: Branding Strategy Impact
The ECRHS's current branding strategy needs improvement. In particular, a branding strategy refers to a holistic approach that builds a company’s favorability and identification with potential customers. Despite the merger, the ECRHS leadership for the three entities has not been harmonized. Based on the service line performance, it is clear that the ECRHS needs to improve numerous things. Some of the areas that require improvement include obstetrical deliveries, recruiting younger cardiologists, orthopedic, emergency department, general surgery, and the marketing department (“East Chestnut Regional Health System,” 2021). The ECRHS should ensure that many individuals from Chestnut, Butternut, Walnut, Maple, and Oak counties chose it when they need treatment.
The ECRHS is perceived as a good hospital since it has a reputable brand. However, the hospital is not providing high-quality healthcare services in all its departments. Since the merger, the ECRHS does not have good governance. For instance, its chief executive officers (CEOs) have been coming and going. Other executive leaders, such as the chief nursing officer (CNO) and the chief operating officer (COO), should be removed. In other words, despite the ECRHS having appropriate resources, it lacks the human capital to steer the hospital in the right direction.
The current legal cases have adverse impacts on the ECRHS within the community and its consumers. For example, the merger and acquisition of the NMHC raised questions about antitrust. Specifically, ECRH has been found to have 52% of the oncology and 60% of the cardiology market share (“East Chestnut Regional Health System,” 2021). Another case that significantly affects how the ECRHS is perceived by its potential consumers involves an elderly patient whose home was taken away to cater to her medical bills. The family had maintained this home for more than 100 years (“East Chestnut Regional Health System,” 2021). These legal cases are likely to reduce the probability of potential consumers selecting this healthcare provider.
Acquisitions of healthcare facilities can positively or negatively affect the brand image and the consumer choice of an organization. Notably, acquired hospitals converge with the behavior of the parent company (Eliason, Heebsh, McDevitt, & Roberts, 2020). In the scenario at hand, ERMC, on the east side of Chestnut River, was the anchor hospital. Since the reputation of this hospital has deteriorated for the last 3-5 years, acquiring other facilities does not change its brand image (“East Chestnut Regional Health System,” 2021). ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Coursework Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!