The Grant Corporation

Case Study Instructions:

The Chapter Case Study is found in your eBook. See Course Materials. The case study requires students to answer the case study questions using the content of the chapter related to the case in essay format using your OWN voice. Do not list your answers. Essay's using your own voice as opposed to writing responses verbatim from the textbook, will result in better readability report through the plagiarism checker. Each case is unique and has different questions and varying quantities of questions. Unless you are asked for your opinion, your answers must sync with the lesson and the relevant information associated with chapter subject-matter and objectives. Submitted work that demonstrates a lack of understanding of the content or demonstrates failure to read and address the chapter content directly, as it relates to the questions, will not receive any credit. Locate the assigned case study according to the chapter number and case study title of the assignment.
This is a college level course and your work should reflect this in terms of of quality of answers, formatting, spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc. Please thoroughly review your work prior to submitting and review the CASE STUDY GRADING RUBRIC located further below on the page.
Your response MUST be in the form of an essay. If you are not certain on how to create a case analysis essay, use this link to help guide you. Responses that are NOT properly formatted will not be graded. Also, see the grading rubric to ensure a successful response.
APA Essay GuidelinesLinks to an external site.: (this link is one of many internet resources available)
Your essay should be typed and double-spaced, standard-sized (8.5" x 11"), with 1" margins on all sides. Use a widely available 11 or 12 point fonts. These include sans serif fonts such as 11-point Calibri, 11-point Arial, and 10-point Lucida Sans Unicode as well as serif fonts such as 12-point Times New Roman, 11-point Georgia, 10-point Computer Modern.
bookmark-1.pngThe purpose of this particular case (based upon content in chapter 5), is to introduce Julia Woodland, the new HR director at Grant Corporation, who is responsible for developing a more strategic HR function. As she begins in the role and starts to implement changes, she is facing many challenges and much resistance.
Your submitted work will be evaluated through a plagiarism checker (Turnitin) and a report will be available to you after your submission. Plagiarized work will receive no credit and may be reported to administration. See the student handbook for more information. Ideally you want your plagiarism report to reflect blue or green status. See this document for more information on reading your plagiarism report.

Case Study Sample Content Preview:

Case Study CH. 5: The Grant Corporation
Name of the Student
Institution Affiliation
Course Name
Professor’s Name
Date
Case Study CH. 5: The Grant Corporation
Julia Woodland made some positive measures to fix Grant Corporation's HR department. She acknowledged the need for change and proposed buying an integrated payroll/HRIS system to boost efficiency and accuracy (“The Grant Corporation,” (n.d.). She also hired a hiring firm to fill available positions to solve the acute resource deficit. She tried to email the entire firm about the new system's benefits. In several areas, she could have done better. She should have consulted her HR personnel on the new system and decision-making. Her decision-making without their input may have caused their anxiety.
Woodland delayed critical stakeholder involvement in implementation. She should have consulted IT and finance early about server and system integration. She was wrong to think she could implement without these crucial departments. Implementing and aligning the organization's IT strategy would have been easier with an inclusive approach.
Woodland should have informed her team about the changes and their rationale. Her workers seemed unaware of the new system and its ramifications, causing anxiety and opposition (“The Grant Corporation,” (n.d.). She should have openly communicated with her team about the modifications' goals, how they would improve the department, and how they would involve her personnel. Her team would have trusted an...

Updated on January 26, 2024

Get the Whole Paper!

Not exactly what you need?

Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Order

The Grant Corporation

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to plagiarism: