Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
4 pages/≈1100 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Law
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 17.28
Topic:

The IRAC method (Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion) Case Study

Case Study Instructions:

Student name:


Student ID:


 


INSTRUCTION:


You have been given the facts. Compose an answer using the IRAC method (Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion). Marks are allocated on the following basis:
Issue 4 marks, Rules 6 marks, Application 8 marks, and Conclusion 2 marks. The assignment has a MAXIMUM limit of 1200 words. Marks be will be allocated using a rubric based on the marking criteria below. This assessment is worth 20% of your final grade. This assignment must be submitted using Turnitin by Sunday 18th . You can find out more information about Turnitin on Blackboard under ‘Help for Students’.


 


QUESTION:


António was interested in buying a photography studio from David. António suffered from a mild intellectual disability and did not understand complex transactions.


António’s first language is Portuguese and although he could understand English he was unable to read it very well. David did not know António very well but he was aware of his disabilities because he had been a regular attendee at his photography classes.


David’s partner had recently received a promotion involving a transfer to Japan and was keen to sell his Australian business quickly. He told António that the business had “lots of potential” and “if António worked hard he could make a lot of money”.


David showed António the financial statements for the business for the past 5 years. António did not understand the accounts but was too embarrassed to ask for any explanation. The statements showed that the business had never made a profit.


David told António that others had shown interest in purchasing the business so he would need to act quickly. António signed the contract before obtaining any legal advice.


 


The legal issue to be resolved:


Can António successfully argue that the contract can be set aside on the grounds of unconscionable conduct and/or undue influence?


 


 


 


 


IRAC RUBRIC FOR MARKING 



 



Outstanding



Effective



Basic



Unsatisfactory



Issue 20%


The Issue section identifies the area of law that is relevant to the problem question and clearly describes the legal problem(s) that need to be addressed



The area of law and the legal problem(s) to be addressed are identified and clearly and completely described.
4 marks



The area of law and the legal problem(s) to be addressed are identified, but the description of the problem(s) are not clear or are incomplete.
2 - 3 marks



The area of law is correctly identified, but the statement does not clearly describe the legal problem(s) that need to be addressed.
1 marks



The relevant area of law is not identified.
0 marks



Rules 30%


The Rules section identifies the relevant legal principles and their source of authority. The source of authority will be an Act of Parliament, case law or a combination of both. If there is an Act of Parliament which covers the field in this area, you need to identify the Act correctly and whether it is a Commonwealth or State Act



All relevant legal principles are clearly explained, and their correct source of authority is given.
5 - 6 marks



All or most of the relevant legal principles and their correct source of authority have been cited, but the explanation of the principles is not clear or is incomplete.
3 - 4 marks



Some identification of relevant legal principles but the correct source of authority (Section of Act or relevant case) has not been cited.
1 - 2 marks



No relevant legal principles have been identified.
0 marks



Application/Analysis 40%


The Application section considers each legal principle identified in the Rules section and explains its relevance to the facts and how it can be applied or distinguished to support logical arguments about how the Issue(s) will be resolved



The discussion is a clear and comprehensive analysis of the relevant legal principles and their application to the facts to support logical arguments about how the Issue(s) will be resolved
7 - 8 marks



The discussion considers the application of most of the relevant legal principles to the key facts, but the arguments are not clear or are incomplete.
4 - 6 marks



The discussion considers some of the relevant legal principles but does not apply those principles to the key facts to support logical arguments about how the Issue(s) will be resolved.
1 - 3 marks



The discussion of the facts does not refer to any relevant legal principles.
0 marks



Conclusion 10%


The Conclusion is stated and provides an overview of how the arguments in the Application section address the Issue(s).



The Conclusion is well supported by arguments in the Application section and clearly explains how those arguments address the Issue(s).
2 marks



The Conclusion is supported by most of the arguments, but the explanation of how those arguments address the Issue(s) is not clear or is incomplete
1.5 mark



The Conclusion is supported by some of the arguments but does not explain how they address the Issue(s).
1 mark



The Conclusion is not stated or is not supported.
0 marks



Case Study Sample Content Preview:
IRAC TASK
Student Name
Course
Date
IRAC Task
Issue
Antonio desires to purchase a photography business and David manages to link him to a seller. Antonio has a mild disability and does not understand the complex transactions involved in completing the purchase. David understands Antonio’s situation but tricks him into believing that the identified business makes profit. Based on the facts provided, can Antonio argue that the contract be set aside on the basis of unconscionable conduct and undue influence?
Rule
Unconscionable conduct refers to a mean behavior that is so harsh and violates the good conscience. It mainly involves a dominant party taking advantage of a weaker party. The Australian consumer law prohibits businesses from engaging in unconscionable conduct when dealing with businesses or their customers. The conduct has to be harsh or oppressive to be perceived as unfair and has to be against the societal norms. Australian courts have dealt with several cases of unconscious conduct when they find out that the exercise was deliberate, involves serious misconduct and the conduct can be classified as unfair and unreasonable.
The law safeguards the vulnerable individuals against such forms of exploitation through three main sections of the competition and consumer aid. Section 20 of the Australian consumer law prohibits unconscionability that a corporation may engage within the meaning of the unwritten law, implying the equitable doctrine of unconscionable conduct. The section states that, “A person must not, in trade or commerce, engage in conduct that is unconscionable within the meaning of the unwritten law, from time to time.” therefore, according to this section, no one is allowed to engage in any conduct that he knows violates the ethical code of conduct.[Australian Competition Law. “Section 20 Unconscionable Conduct within the Meaning of the Unwritten Law,” 2017. /legislation/provisions/acl20.html.]
The second section against the unconscionable conduct is section 21, which warns against unconscionable conduct in regards to the supply or acquisition of goods and services by or from an individual other than a listed public company. This section is not meant to be restricted by the unwritten law regarding the unconscionable conduct. Any relevant factors surpass the consideration of the prevailing circumstances in the formation of the contract. The section states that “A person my not, in trade or commerce, in connection with the supply or possible supply of goods or services to a person other than a public company engage in a conduct that is, in all circumstances, unconscionable.” Therefore, no person should engage in either the sell or purchase of goods or services in which he understands the actions as being unconscionable.
Section 22 provides some exceptions to the section 21 guidelines. According to this section, the court may have regard to only cases where there was a significant bargaining power on either the side of the buyer or the supplier, or whether the conduct that the supplier engage in did not necessarily require protection of the interests of the buyer or the supplier. It also provides the exception in cases where the buyer was able to under...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Case Study Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!