Appraising Qualitative Evidence for Clinical Decision Making

Qualitative Evidence for Clinical Decision Making Qualitative Case Study
Answer 1
The research by Fraser et al. (2007) assessed the experience of neonatal nurses while giving care to newborns exposed to the intra-uterine drug in the health care setting. The research was based on open-ended semi-structured interviews that involved eight neonatal nurses. It was an interpretive method of research that emphasizes the analytical disclosure of the evidence-based practice and presents the configuration of these practices in generating the observable results. This research described the externally observable, usually changeable, characteristics of a particular phenomenon or process under study and identified their inner, deep stable sides, mechanisms, and driving forces related to the research problems.
Answer 2
Trustworthiness indicates the extent of confidence in the data, interpretations, and the method involved in ensuring the quality of research (Connelly, 2016). The sign of trustworthiness of scientific study characterizes it from the point of view of substantive truth and ability. Naturally, the completeness and consistency of any study will always be relative.
The evaluation criterion is the most challenging and acute issue for any scientific research; what criteria are used to evaluate scientific innovations or theories. Criteria are generally the actual problem for any activity (Hamilton et al., 2020). The criteria for the trustworthiness of the results of an empirical study must satisfy, in particular, the following criteria:
1. Criteria should be objective, making it possible to evaluate the feature under study unambiguously and avoid controversial assessments by different people.
2. The criteria must be adequate and valid, i.e., evaluate precisely what the experimenter wants to evaluate. Especially acute is the requirement for the adequacy of the criteria for researchers involved in the problems of educating young people.
3. The criteria must be neutral concerning the phenomenon under study. For instance, the research problem must be specified, and the researchers should co-relate the existing results.
Answer 3
The qualitative evidence leads to several values and advantages to the body of evidence. For instance, it helps eliminate potential errors and obtain reliable results from research. In addition, there is transparency in qualitative evidence which also ensures the accuracy of estimates obtained from the results.
Moreover, the qualitative evidence allows for an adequate generalization of the results of scientific research. Most qualitative evidence consists of a balanced and unbiased examination of the research problem. For example, a systematic review often conducts a quantitative assessment of the total effect established based on the results of all the studied studies (meta-analysis).
Quantitative Case Study
Answer 1
DeShawn’s team took the following steps in the evidence-based project (EBP) process:
1. Asking the Clinical Questions
DeShawn’s team created the PICOT question to examine the influence of opioid addiction among parents on the attitude of their children. The research investigated the behavior of such children towards drug usage.
2. Seek Out Valid Proof ...