Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
11 pages/β‰ˆ3025 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Psychology
Type:
Term Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 57.02
Topic:

Understanding Cognitive Mechanism

Term Paper Instructions:

You will need to use Google Scholar to search for journal articles and review articles using keywords to find relevant articles, and read at least 5-10 good articles before you can start writing a good term paper. Note also that all of these topics require you to contribute some original thinking of your own. Reading papers first will help you make sophisticated arguments, which will receive higher marks.
There are two parts in this assignment.
Term Paper (25 marks: 20 marks for term paper + 5 marks for chatGPT critique)
1. Introduction and clarity of describing the background literature and specifying the nature of the problem – 3 marks
2. Describing the different schools of thought that tackle the question – 7 marks
3. Offer your own thinking on the matter (either siding with one school of thought, or offering a new insight or suggestions for experiments or investigations, providing appropriate justifications) – 5 marks
4. Overall clarity, organization of thoughts, and originality – 3 marks
5. Formatting (Citations, References) – 2 marks
Recommended: 8-10 pages, font size 12, single-spaced.
Everyone: Needs to include chatGPT output on the same topic along with your critique of the output as explained in class by the TA. Worth 5 marks.(This can have around 500 words. It can be even less that that. Its just a critique about chatgpt. There is a ppt as to how to approach this segment. I have attached a file called DumbGPT. pls scroll down and refer it for the sample task on how to do this task)
1. The links and list of prompts used to generate the 2000-2500 chatGPT output
– 1 marks
2. Critique of the output – 3 marks (0.5 marks for verifying the sources and citations, 2.5 marks for substantive critique of the output by citing what you learned from the course or from additional reading)
3. Quality of your critique – 1 mark (this will directly depend on whether you did your human-generated essay by yourself first and the quality of that).
Pointers to remember(This is the feedback to the people who have already submitted):
1. Do not format your papers with brief bullet points, this is supposed to be a term paper. A term paper is like an essay, with proper headings and subheadings to help organize your arguments.
2. Some people have only cited 4-6 papers which is typically insufficient as your task is to read as many papers as possible and cite them to make your arguments.
3. Many have not appended the chatGPT output with their critique of it.
4. Please submit one single PDF with your term paper + chatGPT output and critique
This term papers has 25 percent of my grade total. So I request you to write it technically sounding and sophisticated as much as possible. These are the few pointers which my TA provided on how it would be graded. Few pointers from the TA:
1. It would be strictly rubric
2. Should place the references in proper format and write the opinions first and then chatgpt prompts which is the second part of the term paper. Prompts should be clear and critique on the output point wise
3. When you are writing the options, make sure they are neatly formatted as how a term paper should be
4. If you follow this format then you should get 15 out of 20 easily
5. Plagiarism software and ai tools(except for the 2nd CHATGPT part) would be run so should be careful.

Term Paper Sample Content Preview:


Cognitive Mechanism
Student Name
Institutional Affiliation
Date
Cognitive Mechanism
Introduction
Over the years, the human brain has been fascinating to researchers and laypersons alike. Cognitive science started as an endeavor to understand how the brain works and has to an extent provided an opportunity for individuals to explore various mechanisms underlying the functioning of the brain. Over the years, researchers have been asking questions regarding the methodologies and levels of explanations to pursue this goal. An understanding of the mechanism underlying cognitive processes is critical in explaining how the processes work. This paper demonstrates what it means to understand such a mechanism, the challenges of relying on a verbal description of the mechanism, and how building a functioning brain from the bottom up cannot explain how the brain works.
Implications of a Mechanism
The claim that scientists understand the mechanisms underlying a cognitive phenomenon like memory resonates differently with different schools of thought. However, before delving into the debate, we start by establishing the meaning of a "mechanism" to assist in aligning the different arguments. Glennan (2002) considers a mechanism as a complex system which produces a behaviour through the interaction of the various parts, and where the interactions are characterized by direct and change relative generalizations. Researchers Bechtel & Abrahamsen (2005) build on Glennan’s work and consider a mechanism as a structure performing a function in virtual of its parts, component operations and their organizations. Bechtel & Abrahamsen (2005) further indicate that the orchestrated operation of the mechanism accounts for one or more phenomena. The definitions indicate that mechanisms imply something beyond aggregates of their parts but something active and causal.
A mechanistic account holds that a phenomenon can be explained through the provision of an accurate and sufficient description. In other words, it presents a model of how the hierarchical causal systems, which have different parts manage to produce and sustain the phenomenon. The construction of an explanatory mechanistic model will entail mapping all the constituent models in such a way that the different components of the model point to the constituent parts to demonstrate the organization resulting in casual relations. When investigators examine a mechanism that is responsible for a certain phenomenon, they tend to assume that there should be underlying mechanisms that permit the components of the mechanism to participate in the various activities. In such a case, a mechanism at a lower level of the mechanistic organization will be embedded in a higher-level mechanism which affects how it operates. Since mechanisms are spatiotemporally local, investigators are interested in classifying them into different types and deriving generalizations. The achievement of generality is achieved through abstracting the details of mechanisms and idealizing some of their attributes. Craver & Darden (2013) warn that abstraction leaves out details about the target mechanism, while idealization a...

Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Term Paper Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now