Should Parties Nominate Through a National Primary?

SHOULD PARTIES NOMINATE THROUGH A NATIONAL PRIMARY?
Insert Name
Institution Affiliation
Due Date
In countries with many states like United State of America, a national primary is an option compared to countries without any states. After every four years, the United States seeks the opinion of the voters regarding whom they want to lead them as President. In the race for Presidency, major political parties in the United States select their presidential candidates through the process of primary elections. However, voters do not directly select presidential nominee in these primaries. Instead, they select delegates from their particular states who will attend a national party convection to nominate a presidential candidate for their party. This brings to question, whether national primary would be a plausible idea, where by the whole nation would vote to select a party nominee on a single day.
The U.S presidency, the twentieth-century, became the only most influential political institution in the United States since it was the only elected office to represent a national constituency. Surprisingly, framers of the constitution did not include presidential nomination for they did not see the rise of political parties. Institutionally, nominating U.S. presidential was never rationally designed but has gone through many reforms till today we talk of national primaries.
A national primary would be a sinking ship for the American dream which has been encouraging anybody regardless of the background would grow up to become the President. This is because only the most popular and wealthy people would make it become President. This, therefore, reduces the chances of a candidate who is less popular and less funded. In his work Ellis observed that primary calendar spanning months can easily accommodate less funded candidates to grow their campaign from a couple of states and finally be elected to serve in the White House as was proved by Jimmy Carter.
Notably, unlike nationalizing election process, regional primaries enable every state to have the privilege to play a role: that is the nation is divided into four regions that would take turns in voting first. Through this approach, the voters would have a thorough encounter with the candidates and how the manner in which they perform and how they deal with public issues affecting each region. This system would alleviate the fundraising pressure that forces candidates out of the competition by offering organizational and monetary benefits which come with regional campaigning.
National primary, to some extend is but a recipe of failure. This unsuccessful end of the situation grants national primary for all parties a chaotic process. It will also favor strongly influential and well-funded candidat...