Reading Response - Globalization. Life Sciences Coursework.
Read articles and respond the questions.
Reading Response - Globalization:
“What is the essential dividing line between human beings around the world?”
In your opinion, is there one fundamental difference which separates people of the wold?
What is the primary division of the world?
As global citizens vs citizens of somewhere?
As the winners and losers from globalization?
As a clash of civilizations?
There is no necessarily correct answer for this assignment - points will be given for clear expression of thought.
An equally valid response is to explain why you think there isn’t one fundamental way in which the world separates.
Assignment instructions:
Part 1
Read the three articles:
1 - Friedman - It's a flat world, after all
2 - Forsyth - Theresa May's new 3rd way
3 - Gelfand - Here's the science...
Part 2
Summarize and explain the key global division identified in each article. This should be at least a paragraph per article.
Part 3
Which of the three approaches do you find most convincing for explaining the world? Give justification for your answer. If you prefer a different framework for identifying the world (e.g. Huntingdon's Clash of Civilization thesis), this is the point to introduce it. To have a chance of maximum points, you should try and explore how the three readings connect with each other, even though they use different frameworks. For example, are the winners and losers for Friedman the same groups as Gelfand identifies?
Part 4
Depending on your answer to Part 3 - which single policy would you advocate for to improve the quality of life of those identified as losing out from globalization.
The essential dividing line between human beings around the world is their behavior. An example of this can be taken from the fact that some people do not behave good, and this makes others feel that they are animals. On the other hand, those who behave nicely and give utmost respect to others get the same type of value in return. These types of people are called good human beings. The world we live in is full of both good and bad people, and what matters the most is that we amend our ways and leave a good impression on the minds of people we meet on a daily basis.
In my opinion, one fundamental difference between people of the world is their religious values or beliefs. Those who listen to their elders and are religious would surely be cooperative, and those who are non-religious or do not know how to follow the footsteps of their elders might never get to know the meaning and purpose of humanity. One thing that we need to remember is that not all religious people are kind and noble; some of them are emotional or extremists and know how to create a mess for people around them.
The primary division of the world is as global citizens vs. citizens of somewhere. It can neither be the winners vs. losers nor be a clash of civilizations. This is because people are born in different areas, towns, cities, and countries, and they are all global citizens performing varying duties and contributing to the betterment of the Earth in their dist...
You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to globalization essays:
- Museums as a Site for Culture2 pages/≈550 words | APA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- Reading Response: Globalization4 pages/≈1100 words | APA | Social Sciences | Essay |
- Microsoft Corporation: Impact of Globalization & Technological Changes3 pages/≈825 words | APA | Business & Marketing | Research Paper |
- Globalization and its Impacts on Economy1 page/≈275 words | No Sources | MLA | Business & Marketing | Essay |
- Globalization Has Accelerated So Rapidly. Business & Marketing Essay1 page/≈275 words | No Sources | MLA | Business & Marketing | Essay |
- How Falling Barriers to Investment and Trade Reduce Inequality Between Nations2 pages/≈550 words | 3 Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Essay |
- Impact of Globalization on Jobs and Wages1 page/≈275 words | 3 Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Other (Not Listed) |