The Case against TV Censorship (Thesis Proposal Sample)
Good writers spend time practicing exploratory thinking about a topic before arriving at a thesis.
In preparation for this journal entry, please review the following persuasive essay topic choices:
Consider media censorship, particularly for the radio and primetime TV. Do you think that it is necessary or justified? Are there times when censorship goes over the top? Or do you think current censorship policies are not enough?
For Journal #3, you are expected to begin your consideration of the topic by using sources in the Opposing Viewpoints Database to contemplate the complexity of the issue, entertain multiple perspectives, and examine new ideas while you allow your thinking on the issue to evolve. You will then respond to the following journal questions:
What topic do you choose? What is your thesis statement? What is your position on the topic? Include 2–3 points to support your position. Identify at least two sources that you will use to support the points. What is at least one opposing viewpoint? Include 2–3 points to refute the opposing position. Identify at least one source that you will use to support the points.
The Case against TV Censorship
The Case against TV Censorship
The Television set has grown to become of the necessities in each American home. In order to ensure that the content that is viewed on television is appropriate for all the age groups, the government has been blocking all the content that is viewed as offensive. In the United States, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is the one that is responsible for censoring all the TV content that is considered to be inappropriate. The FCC regulation stipulates that TV channels are not supposed to show any obscene content between 6am and 10pm. Across the board, the views on whether TV content should be censored has been received mixed feeling with some people claiming that this is warranted while others claim that this is inappropriate. Despite the reasons that are fronted to support TV censorship, the truth is that these reasons do not solve any of the intended problems and in the real sense bring about more harm than good.
One of the reasons that is affronted as a major reason for TV censoring is that it perpetrates violence among young people. This claim has been gaining much ground, especially considering that young people are spending more time than any other time in history watching television. Due to their undeveloped mind, most young people are not capable of filtering the most of the information that is passed across in television thus calling for the need to censor any TV content that might propagate violence or loose morals. According to the FCC, most people spend an average of 3 hours watching television meaning that this becomes an important influence in individual lives. Since the brain develops at different levels, there is a high likelihood that developing minds are fragile and can therefore pick up nearly everything without pausing to consider whether it is right or not. The proponents of TV censoring have also been claiming that violent TV content is to blame for the high rate of crime in the country and that censoring will drastically reduce this problem (Greenwald, 2013).
Despite the enticing arguments that are given to support TV censoring, the truth is that the practice is inappropriate first and foremost because it infringes on people’s freedom of speech and expression. Under the First Amendment, every American individual is given the freedom of speech and expression and censoring television takes away this basic human right. The National Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) has been on the forefront in educating people against the dangers of censorship and ensuring that the FCC discontinues this retrogressive policy. For many years, America has been seen as an example of how democracy should function to the rest of the world and censoring TV has made many people to start questioning whether the nation is still worthy of this privilege. A healthy and operational democracy is characterized by the freedom of expression and the incapacity to air one’s ideas is hazardous to ethical, creative, and academic growth (Charren, 2006).
No matter the perspective from which it is examined, the truth is that TV censorship embodies an unreasonable amount of power and authoritarianism over the mental and intellectual capability of all individuals. On February 1, 2004, CBS was fined $550,000 for a Janet Jackson’s ‘wardrobe malfunction’ during a live Super Bowl game. Later on that year, 111 TV stations that aired the CBS show “Without a Trace” were fined a record $3.6 million for the claims that the show featured teenagers in a sexual orgy. However, CBS defended the program by claim...
- The Case against TV Censorship Description: In order to ensure that the content that is viewed on television is appropriate for all the age groups, the government has been blocking all the content that is viewed as offensive...5 pages/≈1375 words | 3 Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Thesis Proposal |
- Exploring a Portfolio Topic: Developing a Working Thesis Description: Thesis - Puppy Mills in the US Literature & Language Thesis Proposal...3 pages/≈825 words | 2 Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Thesis Proposal |
- Marketing of unhealthy food to children Description: Undergraduate writing level 4 pages Literature and Language Format Style English (U.S.) Thesis Proposal. Marketing of unhealthy food to children ...4 pages/≈1100 words | 3 Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Thesis Proposal |