No One Should Die Because They Live Too Far From A Doctor

Term Paper Instructions:

In your essay, judge how effective you found the speech to be based on the various tools the writer/speaker used to perform his or her task.
it might be helpful to think of your role as similar to that of a movie critic. Just as a movie critic might write about the positive and negative aspects of a film before passing judgment (“thumbs up” or “3 stars” or however they choose to rate it), you will explore the positive and negative aspects a the speech to justify your own judgment (“I found this speech to be very effective” or “I found it somewhat ineffective” or however you choose to rate it).
Introduction:
Your introduction should begin by connecting with your audience. A recommended way to do this for this essay is to first write a short personal story (anecdote) about your life that relates to the topic of the speech that you are analyzing.
The next task of your introduction is to provide relevant background information about the speech that you are analyzing. Remember that your audience may know nothing about it. To do this, analyze the rhetorical situation of the speech. This means that you should briefly explain who wrote the speech and what that person’s experiences and credentials are, when the speech was given, where the speech was given and any relevant information about the TED organization, a detailed analysis of the audience for the speech (what you can infer about their cultural background and how that relates to their values and beliefs), and an analysis of the purpose of the speech. Be sure to include an analysis of the kairos of the speech: what does or doesn’t make this time and place an opportune moment for the speech’s argument.
A good place for the thesis statement of your essay may be at the end of your introduction paragraph. Try to transition smoothly between these three parts of your introduction. Look up “exordium” in classical argument for more info about introductions.
Thesis:
Many students find it helpful to craft their thesis around an overriding judgment they make about the speech. For example, they might choose to say, “Although the speech makes some unsupported claims and uses an overly aggressive tone, it is ultimately effective because of its use of imagery and stories from childhood to appeal to the value of innocence and evoke feelings of guilt.” Then, the body of your essay will serve to support that judgment, whatever it may be.
Summary:
After your introduction, write a short paragraph summarizing what the speech says. State the speech’s thesis (main idea) and main points that the speech makes, and briefly explain how the points are made and supported. Include any patterns of organization and patterns of supporting evidence that you notice. Someone who has not heard the speech should understand the most important points in the speech by reading your paragraph.
Rhetorical Analysis Body Paragraphs:
After your introduction paragraph and summary paragraph, the body of your essay will analyze HOW the speaker makes his or her argument. This means identifying WHAT strategies and choices the speaker made, and explaining WHY he or she made each choice. So, the details inside each rhetorical analysis body paragraph should follow a pattern of describing a choice that the speaker made, and then analyzing why the speaker made that choice.
You may organize your essay chronologically based on the order in which the speech is given, or you may organize your essay based on the rhetorical appeals identified by Aristotle: logos, ethos, and pathos. However, in order to promote clear writing and critical thinking, I do not want you to use the words logos, ethos, or pathos in your essay. Instead, I want you to write about these concepts without naming them.
Questions about ethos that your essay may answer:
What kind of character or attitude did the speaker convey? (What kind of person did s/he try to seem like?) How and why?
How did the speaker present himself/herself as a credible and trustworthy person?
How did the speaker present himself/herself as an expert on this topic?
What did the speaker reveal about himself/herself first, second, third, and so on, and why this order?
What tone and attitude or disposition did the speaker convey, and why?
Questions about logos that your essay may answer:
What were the main points and/or reasons that the speaker used, and why?
Why were these points presented in this specific order?
What kinds of evidence were used to support these points (for example: statistics, expert testimonies and quotes, personal anecdotes and experiences), and what kinds were not?
What evidence is missing or weak? How does that affect the argument's effectiveness?
Is there a pattern to the kinds of evidence used, and what is the effect of that pattern?
Questions about pathos that your essay may answer:
What emotions did the speaker intend to cause the audience to feel? How do those emotions advance the speaker’s argument? What did the speaker do to elicit those emotions?
What are some beliefs and values that the audience might hold deeply, and how did the speaker use these to advance his/her argument?
What are some beliefs and values in the wider culture of this audience that the speaker appealed to, and why?
Read chapter 6 of Everything’s an Argument for more on rhetorical analysis. Your essay should answer all of the questions on page 90 as well as analyze the structure and style of the argument as described on pages 101-102.
Conclusion
Your conclusion paragraph should return to your overall evaluation of the speech’s effectiveness, AND place your evaluation in a deeper or changed perspective. One way to do this is to elaborate on the purpose and kairos of the speech. Another way is to write a reflection on what you learned from analyzing this specific speech about what makes rhetoric effective or ineffective.
Sources
Your essay must cite at least 2 sources: your chosen speech, and the course textbook, Everything's an Argument. Check the index for where to find information about logos, ethos, and pathos that may be relevant to quote for support of at least one of your body paragraphs or conclusion.
All sources should be documented, using MLA as a citation method. Follow the format for in-text citations in your book on pp. 467-471, and include a Works Cited page that follows the format on pp. 472-484. Your finished essay should follow the document format on pp. 485-486.
Audience:
Your audience will be the other members of this class: that is to say, students of composition and rhetoric. Over the course of this unit you’ll be learning a few concepts that you may not have ever been exposed to before. You won’t be required to define those terms and concepts within your essay, as you know that your intended audience should be familiar with them. Your responsibility is to demonstrate your knowledge of those concepts and terms by applying them to the work that you’ll be critiquing.
Criteria
Seek to produce 4-5 pages, typed, standard 1 inch margins in 12-point font. Your essay should be properly documented using MLA citation method. MLA requires both in-text citations and a works cited page.

Term Paper Sample Content Preview:

Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Course
Date
Rhetorical Analysis of Panjabi’s “No one should die because they live too far from a Doctor”
I still remember when I lost a friend of mine who lived in Africa because she could not access medical care on time. She suffered a pregnancy complication and died because she could not reach the hospital on time due to poor roads in the region. Lack of access to health care is not uncommon in majority parts of the world. Panjabi, a practicing doctor in the United States, recognizes this fact and gave a speech “No one should die because they live too far from a Doctor” in 2017 during one of the TED shows. He points out that while access to health care is limited, diseases are universal and it is thus imperative that access to health care is made universal too. Panjabi uses his credibility as a doctor who has experienced life in both low and high-income countries to appeal to his audience. The use of personal information as a background of his speech, repetition, and images to appeal to his audience is very persuasive, although the lack of personal introduction and statistics to support his proposition, in the end, damages his credibility.
Panjabi starts his speech with a personal story where he describes his life as a young boy living in Liberia pre-civil war. The benefit of using a personal story at the beginning of a speech is that it attracts the attention of the listeners and points them to what the speech is about (Sturges 3). In his case, Panjabi states that while he enjoyed his life in Liberia, it was cut short by the war and they had to relocate to America, an opportunity that was not availed to many Liberians. This shows how inequality affects people’s lives and how different people in the same situation have access to different opportunities. Panjabi continues to narrate how the support he and his family received in America enabled him to start his life and achieve his dream of becoming a doctor. He then remembered the people he left behind in Liberia and decided to go back there to help, which is when he realized how access to health care was a challenge to the people of Liberia. In his speech, he provides possible solutions to the challenge, which include equipping the existing volunteers with necessary resources and training more community health workers.
Not only does Panjabi give a personal story at the start of his speech to attract the attention of his listeners, but he also uses repetition of certain phrases throughout his speech. According to Jaffe (155), repetition is an effective oral strategy which attracts the attention of the audience to a specific point. Panjabi starts his speech by quoting what his father taught him, that “no condition is permanent”. Throughout his speech, he keeps going back to this phrase every now and then. His goal is to convince his audience that even though the condition in Liberia is difficult, it cannot remain that way. It is his way of convincing them to support him because if there is nothing like a permanent situation, it is very possible that together with his audience, he can change the situation. Other than the immediate effect of this repetition on the audience, there i...

Updated on January 26, 2024

Get the Whole Paper!

Not exactly what you need?

Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Order

No One Should Die Because They Live Too Far From A Doctor

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to civil war: