Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
4 Sources
Style:
Chicago
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Term Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 15.55
Topic:

Preemptive War and Foreign Policy

Term Paper Instructions:

Essay Question:


 


You will write a three to five page essay answering the question below. This paper MUST be turned in on the day of the final. Due May 7th, by midnight!


 


In 2002, President George W. Bush’s administration disclosed a new national security strategy that contended that the doctrine of preemptive war against potential threats to American interests at home or throughout the globe would guide the United States’ foreign policy.[1] The National Security Strategy proclaimed: “The United States has long maintained the option of preemptive actions to counter a sufficient threat to our national security.”[2]


 


Do you agree that the doctrine of preemptive war was consistent with America’s relationship with the world or do you consider it to be a departure from America’s historical approach to foreign policy? Be sure to consider the scope of America’s engagement with the rest of globe from the 1890s to 2005. Use three to five historical events to support your argument as you trace the trajectory of U.S. foreign policy.


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


General Guidelines for take-home exams:


 


Papers must be typed, double-spaced, with pages numbered. Please provide a coversheet that includes your name, the date, and your class time.


 


Plan ahead so that you have time to write at least two drafts. Read the first draft carefully both to make sure that it makes sense and coheres logically and to eliminate any grammatical or spelling errors (do not rely on spell check). Make sure that each paragraph is organized around one main idea and has a topic sentence. Eliminate unnecessary words and replace vague and unclear statements with precisely what you want to say. A short, succinct word is always preferable to a long, complicated word.


 


All papers should begin with an introduction of a paragraph or two that set out your purpose and suggest how you are going to go about fulfilling it. Think of the introduction as a guide to the reader so that s/he can anticipate what is to come. At the end of the paper one or two paragraphs should summarize your conclusions.


 


Remember that the paper must be in your own words; using another writer’s words without acknowledgement is plagiarism. If there are (rare) times when you need to use an author’s words, you must put them in quotation marks and provide a citation. The History Department prefers the Turabian’s method of citation (http://guides.library.txstate.edu/writing-citation-style-guide/turabian-chicago). Since you will only be using course readings your citations from the textbook should look like this.[3] Any citations from the Reading the American Past should look like this.[4] Subsequent citations from the textbook should look like this.[5] You will not need a bibliography for this assignment.


 


In assigning grades to your papers, I will look for the following:


-          How well you focus on what the questions asks, including ALL elements of the question.


-          How clear your thesis statement is to understand and how well it is argued.


-          Your understanding of the document(s) to be used in the paper and of the main developments and events covered in the course.


-          A clear sense of chronology in the order of events you discuss.


-          A persuasive, logical argument or statements supported by specific evidence and examples.


-          A writing style that is clear.


-          Organization that helps the reader to follow the sequence of events and the argument.


-          Correct grammar, spelling, usage, and format.


 







[1] “National Security of the United States Required Preemptive War,” in Reading the American Past: Selected Historical Documents, Volume II: From 1865, 5th Edition, ed. Michael P Johnson (Boston: Bedford/St. Martin, 2009), 319 - 324.




[2] “National Security of the United States Required Preemptive War,” in Reading the American Past: Selected Historical Documents, Volume II: From 1865, 5th Edition, ed. Michael P Johnson (Boston: Bedford/St. Martin, 2009), 323.




[3] James L. Roark, Michael P. Johnson, Patricia Cline Cohen, Sarah Stage, Alan Lawson, and Susan M. Hartmann, The American Promise: A History of the United States, Volume II: From 1865, 5th Edition, Value Edition (Boston: Bedford/St. Martin, 2009), page number.




[4] “In-mut-too-yah-lat-lat Describes White Encroachment,” in Reading the American Past: Selected Historical Documents, Volume II: From 1865, 4th Edition, ed. Michael P Johnson (Boston: Bedford/St. Martin, 2009), 35.




[5] Roark, et al., American Promise, page number.



Term Paper Sample Content Preview:

PREEMPTIVE WAR AND FOREIGN POLICY
Name:
Course:
Date:
Preemptive War and Foreign Policy
The United States (US) has had many changes in its policies, with its foreign policies not being an exception. In the year 2002, the US president George W. Bush issued a new strategy through the National Security Strategy (NSS) which was deemed a preemptive policy. In it, Bush asserted that the US will deal with foreign nations preemptively in that it will use all means, including force, to counter any form of threat that may threaten it. This proclamation was faced with a great deal of opposition from many who considered it to be a breach in the American tradition. On the other hand, there are many who supported it with all their might. This paper aims to counter this claim as it declares that Bush’s assertion fell hand-in-hand with American tradition.[Hastedt, Glenn P. American Foreign Policy: Past, Present, and Future. Rowman & Littlefield, 2017.] [Weinstein, Aaron Q. "Civil Religion and the Bush Doctrine of Preemptive War: Revisiting the Civil Religion Hypothesis During the War on Terror." (2016).]
The entire history of the US is filled with cases where preemptive war was the only solution to the dominant crises. In the past, America always acted preemptively to secure its borders. In 1904, President Theodore Roosevelt declared that his country will uphold civilization at all cost, even if it meant to intervene in all cases within the Western Hemisphere. This idea was on the assumption that the Europeans could invade it, dispatch its forces there and seize the land thus, endangering the security of the US. Franklin Roosevelt took up this policy decades later when, in September 1941, the Nazis sank the US ship, Greener. He did so by sinking every German and Italian vessels which attempted to cross North Atlantic. Later, he explained his decision that: "When you see a rattlesnake poised to strike, you do not wait until he has struck before you crush him."[Kaufman, Joyce P. A concise history of US foreign policy. Rowman & Littlefield, 2017.] [Hastedt, Glenn P. American Foreign Policy: Past, Present, and Future. Rowman & Littlefield, 2017.]
In the 1990s, President Bill Clinton also embraced preemptive war as a means of ensuring national security in the US. Clinton invested most of the US resources to military expenditure so that it ended up being even higher than that of a dozen nations coalesced. His aim was to create a military that could respond to any urgent situation in the country including peace keeping, war and conflict resolution. Just before the att...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to war essays:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!