business law Windell hotel and Jones;

BUSINESS LAW Students Name Students Number Instructors Name CASE ONE Question One The answer is option (c). Due to the diversity of citizenship of the litigants, the case will be heard in a federal court. This will ensure there is fairness to the out-of-state litigant (Arwar, 2005). Furthermore the case also meets the diversity jurisdiction because the litigant is seeking more than 75,000 dollars in claim for damages. Question Two The answer is option (d) The court can bring the defendants to Colorado because the corporations are in business and thus maintain a contact with the state. They offer their services to all regardless of the state one comes from. Question Three The answer is option (b) The contract was between the agency and the Windell hotel and Jones got served at the agency. It was not his responsibility to know the age of Jennifer. The hotel should later consider taking legal action against the agency for allowing minors to offer services which could be in breach of their contract. Question Four The answer is option (b) When Jones booked for the service, the company was still owned by Jennifer Hooley and her daughter was yet to attain the age of 18 which is the legal age for contractual capacity. Children are only allowed to enter into contracts of necessaries like food and clothing but not commercial or trading contracts. Question Five The answer is option (a) The advertisement created an express warranty that the services would be available. Under the Uniform Commercial Code any express warranty must be expressly disclaimed and this was not the case. The general disclaimer in the advertisement is insufficient. SHORT ANSWER The court will most rely on the Uniform Commercial Code when deciding on the amount refundable to Jones as trip costs (Sushi, 2003). This legislation will analyze in full the case due to...