Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
5 pages/≈1375 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
Chicago
Subject:
Creative Writing
Type:
Research Proposal
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 20.25
Topic:

Research Proposal: Espionage and Consequentialism Theory

Research Proposal Instructions:

Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin®
Turnitin® enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.
Instructions
In INTL 501 you are required to design a line of research around a topic relevant to this course. For topic ideas please review the syllabus as you'll see the full list of topics covered in the class. Throughout this project you will use the concepts discussed within this course in your case study research paper. We will be using the iRubric to evaluate your work.
Assignment 1: Research Proposal (4-5 pages) - worth 20% of your course grade
As you work through each of the assignments you'll find that some of the components of assignments 1 and 2 can be utilized within your final research paper. This is done so that you may utilize the feedback you've received and incorporate any recommended changes/revisions.
Assignment 1: Research Proposal
The goal of your first assignment is to present a clear research project. Your research proposal should be between 4-5 pages in length not including title page, your preliminary source list and references (of the sources you cite within your proposal).
The research proposal must be submitted as a Word Document Attachment in the Assignments section of the classroom by Sunday, 11:55pm EST at the end of week 2.
You will need to:
1) Present the research problem you intend assess and provide some contextual information that helps demonstrate your understanding of the nature of the problem.
2) Clearly state your single SPECIFIC and academically-rigorous research question and your hypothesis. [Note - ONE academically rich research question].
3) Explain why this is important to investigate. What can we learn from this situation? How will the knowledge we gain through your research help our understanding of the topic?
4) Discuss your theoretical framework. Here you'll summarize/synthesize some of the theories/models and concepts you'll use to assess your research question. You will also need to clearly state your research hypothesis.
5) Discuss your case study research design. Your research design should discuss how you plan to carry out your analysis.
6) Preliminary Source List. - You will need to include a list of at least 8 preliminary sources, 6 of which must be from peer-reviewed journals. These should be listed using Chicago style formatting. As you might remember from INTL 500 there are two Chicago styles including the author-date style, and bibliography-notes style. Make sure you references are consistent throughout. APUS students have access to the official version of the 17th edition of the Chicago Manual of Style Online (CMOS). To access the full CMOS, use this link: Chicago Manual of Style Online. Go here for the Chicago-Style Citation Quick Guide.
Format: Your proposal should include a title page, proposal body, reference page, and a preliminary source list (title, references page, and source list are not included within the page count). Your paper should have 1-inch borders on all four sides, use times new roman-12 point font, be double spaced, and not have an extra space in between paragraphs. (You may need to turn this off in MS word by going to paragraph and selecting "Don't add space between paragraphs of the same style). Since this is an INTL course you need to use the Turabian parenthetical citation style with a references page.
This information is from the Master's Capstone Manual and it should help you develop your research proposal. Students taking the capstone option are required to submit a 5 page research proposal prior to moving forward on their research. These are some of the sections they are required to include within their proposal, they have been included in these instructions as they directly relate to the goals of this assignment.
Introduction. Identifies your specific research question and sets the general context for the study.
Statement of the problem or general research question and context leading to a clear statement of the specific research question.
Background and contextual material justifying why we should study this case or topic.
Purpose statement and hypothesis
If you are having trouble developing a good academically rigorous research question consider this link from George Mason University: The Writing Center
Theoretical Framework. The theoretical framework section develops the theories or models to be used in the study and shows how you have developed testable research hypotheses.
Introduction discussing gaps in the literature, how this study will help fill some of those gaps, and justification for theory or model to be used in study.
Summary of the theory or model to be used in the study, including a diagram of the model if appropriate.
Statement of hypotheses to be tested.
(Here is a helpful explanation on Theoretical frameworks)
Research Design. Describes how you will test the hypothesis and carry out your analysis. It describes the data you will use to test your hypothesis, how you will operationalize and collect data on your variables, and the analytic methods that you will use, noting potential biases and limitations to your research approach. It should include:
Identification and operationalization (measurement) of variables.
Sampling plan (i.e., study population and sampling procedures, if appropriate).
Justification of case studies used.
Data Collection/Sources (secondary literature, archives, interviews, surveys, etc.).
Summary of analysis procedures (pattern-matching, etc.).
Limitations of study and bias discussion.
Reference List. Reference the works that you have cited (direct quotes or paraphrases) in the text. This must be in the school's prescribed format. [In INTL this means Turabian Parenthetical/Reference List format]

Research Proposal Sample Content Preview:

Research Proposal INTL 501
Name
Course
Date
Introduction
Espionage is as old as humanity. Specifically, human spying has been a norm since time immemorial because of the perpetual human conflict, and it remains one of the oldest professions in history. Due to technological advancement, spying has assumed multiple forms alongside characteristics. However, the exchange of information between individuals continues to persist. Lying, deception, and manipulation are all weapons used by the HUMINT collectors to obtain valuable information that can be processed and analyzed as useful information. Often, this piece of valuable information is used by a select group at the highest offices in government to facilitate decision-making by shaping foreign policies and national security goals. Some of the radical reforms witnessed in HUMINT stemmed from the 9/11 attack that was a wake-up call on America's intelligence body on how they handled intelligence. Yet pertinent questions remain unanswered. What compels a country to ask its special citizens to lie, manipulate, and deceive foreign nationals into spying against their respective countries for the sake of foreign policy and national security? And what concerns does this act raise with regard to their sense of self? Is it justifiable for a citizen to spy for another country? This research paper will highlight the fundamentals of ethics of espionage using Consequentialism Theory as it pertains to the human dimension.[Steven A., Stottlemyre "HUMINT, OSINT, or something new? Defining crowdsourced intelligence." International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence 28, no. 3 (2015): 579] [Reece, Doty. "How Can Human Intelligence Collection Be Morally Justified?" Ph.D. diss., University of Kansas, 2018]
Problem statement
The heightened threat of terrorism, including terrorist kidnappings, is a threat to America's and world peace. As such, governments have channeled significant resources, part of which are directed to human intelligence. How, when, and who provides this valuable information remains controversial because it involves deception, lies, manipulation, and sometimes threats. Are the unethical human intelligence operations at the expense of dignity the price to pay for global peace?
Purpose statement and hypothesis
How do you evaluate the methods of human intelligence collectors alongside their spies if their actions are ethical? To this answer, it is possible to apply various moral and ethical theories to their actions, and the outcome would balance the divide between good and bad. Consequentialism theory is the primary focus of this paper.
Consequentialism remains a more flexible theory that would really justify cases of human intelligence collection. Consequentialism is less absolute in matters of strict observation of rules that govern action. Consequentialism asserts that the only thing of absolute value while evaluating if an action is wrong or right is the outcome of the action and not the action itself. "Consequentialism provides the simplest theory of the right: an action is morally right or permissible if it leads to the best outcomes.." However, how does an individual gauge the best consequence? Like most conventional consequentialist, a...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These Chicago Research Proposal Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!