Technology and the Elderly: Social and Moral Implications

PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU START
Please use IEEE format citation instead regular citation. (https://ieee-dataport(dot)org/sites/default/files/analysis/27/IEEE%20Citation%20Guidelines.pdf for the guidelines in IEEE citation)
The topic is technology and the elderly.
Please use as much sourses as possible and please read the instruction below. Thank you!
Description
You will write a research paper in which you examine the social, moral, or professional implications of an ethically controversial, technology-related practice, product, or event. I will provide you a list of topics from which you can choose, or you can choose your own topic. Your analysis should identify at least one social, ethical, or professional principle and/or concept at stake. To bolster your understanding of this principle/concept, please use library research, i.e., resources not found on our syllabus. Your analysis should then clarify what exactly is at stake and make an argument for what you think should be done. “What should be done” could be specified in terms of the (range of) way(s) a computing professional should respond, how professional codes of ethics should be revised, or some other way.
Guidelines
 Please include the following information in the header of your paper:
o First and Last Name
o Word Count
 Please format your paper in the following manner:
o Times New Roman, 12-point font
o Double Spaced
o Numbered Pages
o One-inch Margins
 Please don’t make your essay longer than 1350 words. (This is about 5 pages.) When reporting your wordcount, please don’t include the header, title, section titles, or bibliography of your paper, just the substance of your essay.
 Please use IEEE style citation.
Grade Breakdown1
Introduction /5
 Is your introduction engaging and interesting? Does it invite your reader to read further?
 Do you provide necessary background information, i.e., the subject, topic, and thesis of your paper?
 Do you set up the context of your discussion, e.g., stakes, relevance, etc.?
1 All quotations taken from F. L. Cioffi, The Imaginative Argument: A Practical Manifesto for Writers.
 Do you “set your ideas within a field of discourse,” while also “[distinguishing] your own insight, angle, or interpretation from those that have preceded it,” (p. 85)?
Thesis /5
 Does your thesis present an argument? Does it describe, classify, evaluate, propose, compare-contrast, show a causal-effect, or define?
 Is your thesis “evocative without being vague, clear and specific yet not a mere blueprint for a paper, [nuanced] but not ambiguous,” (p. 65)?
 Does your thesis avoid being a pseudo-thesis?
Body /5
 Do you define thesis-driving terms and/or any other relevant words or concepts?
 Do you use evidence (e.g., quotations, references, etc.) to support and develop your thesis?
 Do you clarify and expand your position by evaluating and commenting on such evidence?
 Do you leverage vivid imagery, examples, etc. to edify your argument?
 Do you expand, complicate, or extend your thesis, allowing your thesis to grow and evolve?
 Do you respond to alternative explanations and/or possible objections to your thesis?
Conclusion /5
 Do you present an enhanced version of your thesis, one that has acquired new, different meaning as a result of your investigation?
 Do you open “new areas of inquiry,” i.e., raise more questions, (80)?
Nuts and Bolts /5
 Does your paper have a title?
 Does your paper include a header?
 Is your paper formatted correctly?
 Is your paper devoid of any spelling and/or grammar mistakes?
 Did you cite your sources correctly? (In-text and Bibliography)
Please follow the instructions thank you! And the citation should be in IEEE style!