The Social, Moral and Ethical Dilemma That Abortion Causes

Social, moral and ethical dilemma of abortion
Name
Date
Institution of affiliation
Moral, social and ethical dilemma of abortion
For a long time, the history of abortion has dominated the current human world with different views projected from various social, religious and legal institutions. Legislations have been formulated by the various governments that have legalized abortions while other agencies and particularly some faith-based organizations have strongly opposed these bills. However, these legislations have done so little to lessen the cases of abortion in different parts of the world. In the United States 58,586, 256 cases of abortion have been reported since the year 1973 when abortion was legalized in over 50 states of America (National Right to Life Committee, 2016). However, there has been a significant decrease throughout the years. Therefore, despite the rise of several associations that are dedicated to maintaining and fighting for human life the number of abortions is threatening the survival of the future generations. This has subjected medical professionals to a dilemma in exploring the abortion aspect. This paper shall focus on the social, moral and ethical dilemmas that surround the abortion debate.
Moral perspective of abortion
Sumner, L. W. (2014), argues that the issue of morality hinges on personhood and individuality. There is a moral conscience that every individual is born with that guides them into whether an act is right or wrong. Pro-life socialists insist that there is life in unborn children. They argue that the life of a fetus should not be cut off in whatever circumstances and argue that they have the right to live. On the other hand, pro-choice claims that fetus does not have the right to life as they are not living, breathing human beings until they reach the point of birth. This reason has been the contention in the debate that the growing fetus has different rights than the woman carrying the baby (Vaughn, L. 2015).
Scientists classify a fetus as a living being and therefore argue that life begins at conception. If this argument holds water, then abortion is, therefore, killing and morally murder is wrong. In 1971, Judith Jarvis Thomson, a moral philosopher, made a similar claim dubbed “A Defense of Abortion.” She raised the argument that abortion could still be morally allowed even if “the fetus has already become a living person before birth,” because “the right to live encompasses not in the right not to be killed unjustly CITATION Nat16 \l 1033 (National Right to Life Committee, 2016). When a woman makes a choice to carry out an abortion in a way that is deemed to be just, then no one’s right to life has been violated.
Social perspective of abortion
The social perspective is more of the religious aspect of it (May and Delston 2015). Every society has its set of rules and regulations that boil down to the moral conscience of right and wrong. While this is debatable, there is a religious aspect that argues that life comes from God and He is the author of our lives. This brings out the point that as a person, the right to end life is not in your hands. The Catholic Church is very vocal among other religions that condemn abortion ...