Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
6 pages/β‰ˆ1650 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Research Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 29.16
Topic:

Critique of Research Studies Research Assignment Paper

Research Paper Instructions:

Critique of Research Studies Instructions
Directions:
Complete a critique of the quantitative and qualitative articles that were submitted in Topic 3.
This assignment will be completed in three parts. Refer to the information below as a guide to the information that should be included in each part.
Follow the guidelines for the quantitative and qualitative article critiques in Chapter 5, Box 5.2: Guide to an Overall Critique of a Quantitative Research Report and Box 5.3: Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report of the textbook or the Research Critique Additional Template Resource.
1) Utilize a central heading to indicate that what follows is the critique of the articles.
2) The side headings of the critique for each article should follow the headings in Box 5.2 and 5.3.
3) Note that within these BASIC guidelines, there are additional references to Detailed Critiquing Guidelines found in various boxes in chapters focused on the various elements of a research study report. Use these to expand the research study and to learn specific terminology appropriate to the critique of research.
When turning in the final submission, please put in the following order: Quantitative Article Critique, Qualitative Article Critique, References (should include the two articles, the text, and any other additional sources).
Critique of Research Studies – Part 1: Due Topic 4
For Part 1 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article:
Quantitative Qualitative
• Title • Title
• Abstract • Abstract
• Introduction • Introduction
o Statement of the problem o Statement of the problem
o Hypotheses or research questions o Research questions
o Literature review o Literature review
o Conceptual/theoretical framework o Conceptual underpinnings
Critique of Research Studies – Part 2: Due Topic 6
For Part 2 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article:
Quantitative Qualitative
• Method • Method
o Protection of human rights o Protection of participants' rights
o Research design o Research design and research tradition
o Population and sample o Sample and setting
o Data collection and measurement o Data collection
o Procedures o Procedures
o Enhancement of trustworthiness
Critique of Research Studies - Part 3: Due Topic 8
For Part 3 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article:
Quantitative Qualitative
• Results • Results
o Data analysis o Data analysis
o Findings
o Reliability and Validity o Findings
• Discussion o Theoretical integrations
o Interpretation of findings • Discussion
o Implications/recommendations o Interpretation of the findings
• Global Issues o Implications/recommendations
o Presentation • Global Issues
o Researcher credibility o Presentation
o Summary assessment o Researcher credibility
o Summary assessment
Qualitative Article
Carusone, S. C., Loeb, M., & Lohfeld, L. (2006). Pneumonia care and the nursing home: a qualitative descriptive study of resident and family member perspectives. BMC geriatrics, 6(1), 2
Quantative Article
Van der Steen, J. T., Ooms, M. E., Adèr, H. J., Ribbe, M. W., & van der Wal, G. (2002). Withholding antibiotic treatment in pneumonia patients with dementia: a quantitative observational study. Archives of internal medicine, 162(15), 1753-1760.
Rubrique

1
Not submitted
0.00%

2
Unsatisfactory
75.00%

3
Less Than Satisfactory
80.00%

4
Satisfactory
88.00%

5
Good
92.00%

6
Excellent
100.00%

70.0 %Content

7.0 % Quantitative Title and Abstract

None
Critique is missing for quantitative research title and abstract.
Critique incompletely or incorrectly addresses guidelines and criteria for a quantitative research title and abstract. Critique is not supported with relevant evidence.
Critique addresses some guidelines and criteria for a quantitative research title and abstract. Parts of the critique are supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses most guidelines and criteria for a quantitative research title and abstract. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for the quantitative research title and abstract. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
28.0 % Quantitative Introduction: Statement of the problem, hypotheses or research questions, literature review, and conceptual framework/theoretical framework

None
Critique is missing for all quantitative introduction components.
Critique is vague and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative research introduction components OR the critique is thorough but is missing three components. Critique is unsupported with evidence.
Critique is brief and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative research introduction components OR the critique is thorough but is missing two components. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.
Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative research introduction components OR the critique is thorough but is missing a component. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative research introduction components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
7.0 % Qualitative Title and Abstract

None
Critique is missing for qualitative research title and abstract.
Critique incompletely or incorrectly addresses guidelines and criteria for a qualitative research title and abstract. Critique is not supported with relevant evidence.
Critique addresses some guidelines and criteria for a qualitative research title and abstract. Parts of the critique are supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses most guidelines and criteria for a qualitative research title and abstract. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for the qualitative research title and abstract. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
28.0 % Qualitative Introduction: Statement of the problem, research questions, literature review, and conceptual underpinnings

None
Critique is missing for all qualitative introduction components.
Critique is vague and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative research introduction components OR the critique is thorough but is missing three components. Critique is unsupported with evidence
Critique is brief and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative research introduction components OR the critique is thorough but is missing two components. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.
Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative research introduction components OR the critique is thorough but is missing a component. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative research introduction components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

20.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

None
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech.
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English.
10.0 %Format

5.0 % Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

None
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
5.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)

None
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style is usually correct.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

Research Paper Sample Content Preview:

Critique of Two Articles
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Part 1
Quantitative and Qualitative
Title
Quantitative: Van der Steen, J. T., Ooms, M. E., Adèr, H. J., Ribbe, M. W., & van der Wal, G. (2002 antibiotic treatment i). Withholding n pneumonia patients with dementia: a quantitative observational study. Archives of internal medicine, 162(15), 1753-1760.
Qualitative:Carusone, S. C., Loeb, M., &Lohfeld, L. (2006). Care and the nursing home: a qualitative descriptive study of resident and family member Pneumonia perspectives. BMC geriatrics, 6(1), 2
Abstract
Qualitative: While it is indeed true that the residents of nursing homes are usually referred to other hospitals for the purposes of diagnostics, the article and its authors seem to have used a lot of assumption by noting that in situ medical care is more beneficial and helpful for complex procedures. This generalization can easily skew the entire course of the research.
Quantitative: It is evident that pneumonia is a life-threatening predicament in nursing homes residents with dementia. Doctors and families of the patients face critical choice weather to withhold antibiotics when patients living days are numbered or treatment is likely to be costly.
Introduction
Pneumonia being a life-threatening disease, in most nursing homes residents with dementia. It leaves both physicians and family members in a dilemma weather to withhold antibiotics from patients when it comes to their realization that the patients living days are numbered in a health care set up. This creates a suspicion among those parties involved.
Qualitative: The article clearly builds up on the assumption that it can obtain the best results and find out a solution to the care of pneumonia, through the interviewing of the patient’s family members on their perspectives. This is a good step to take, however, it is rather inconclusive, to just focus on it as the central point of the study. This is because, medical processes might sometimes be quite different from the general views of the people around. The fact that the people around are against something, isn’t necessarily reason enough for the thing to be wrong, especially in medical perspectives. A supporting question would have been better in ensuring a more conclusive qualitative research.
Quantitative: It is good for the researchers to take note of the fact that there is indeed a dilemma for both the physicians and the family members, when it comes to making decisions concerning antibiotic dissemination to their patients. What the researchers fail to illustrate however, is how such a decision is complex. It looks more like a basic dilemma, than a complex decision making process as indicated. The introductory statement of pneumonia frequently occurring in nursing home patients is a general statement that can be misunderstood by anyone reading the paper. A more specific statement that narrows down the research goals would have been more
Statement of the problem
Decision-making concerning weather the patients to be administered with antibiotics for both the physicians and the family members was challenging to both parties hence leaving the patients in a confused situation which they could not unde...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Research Paper Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now